• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Down to 3 teams for Stafford

deanpet21

Well-Known Member
22,528
1,910
173
Joined
Jul 19, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
49ers, Colts, and us. I thought our first would do it but apparently its going to cost more. Thoughts?
 

Stakesarehigh

One day it will all make sense
44,889
29,346
1,033
Joined
Oct 8, 2016
Location
Cincinnati
Hoopla Cash
$ 77,957.12
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
San Fran holds the best first rounder obviously. If they're going rebuild they may not be terribly interested in expensive veterans.

But if Washington can get him I'd think they'd become the fav to repeat in the East
 

skinz2winz

Well-Known Member
10,596
2,659
293
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
If at all possible, the Lions will want to trade him to the Colts. Gets him out of the NFC.
 

deanpet21

Well-Known Member
22,528
1,910
173
Joined
Jul 19, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
San Fran holds the best first rounder obviously. If they're going rebuild they may not be terribly interested in expensive veterans.

But if Washington can get him I'd think they'd become the fav to repeat in the East


I don't think the 49ers will part with #13. We get Stafford should be favorites to win the East. Even if Dak comes back to Dallas.
 

deanpet21

Well-Known Member
22,528
1,910
173
Joined
Jul 19, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
If at all possible, the Lions will want to trade him to the Colts. Gets him out of the NFC.

True maybe thats why we have to sweeten the pot a little.
 

skinz2winz

Well-Known Member
10,596
2,659
293
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I don't think the 49ers will part with #13. We get Stafford should be favorites to win the East. Even if Dak comes back to Dallas.
Dean, pls tell me why you think Mathew Stafford is a good fit in WASH at this current moment? keep in mind he would basically be a 2 year rental, then what? Pls explain Stafford's fit, the plan moving forward to groom his replacement when he leaves and what talent you can put around him this year in order to make the playoffs to have any shot at a SB this coming season and next before he becomes a FA once more. A real plan that will give other fans confidence we are not wasting draft picks on Stafford who at 33 is beginning to decline, as is his mobility as is his years left of service.

Waiting.....
 

MHSL82

Well-Known Member
17,033
979
113
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.92
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Three way trade: Smith to SF, Stafford to WSH, Garoppolo to DET. SF gets draft picks, WSH gets cash considerations, Detroit save on cap. (I don’t know Garoppolo‘s contract.)
 

MHSL82

Well-Known Member
17,033
979
113
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.92
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I’m not saying my above comment is realistic at all, but how much would Washington have to pay if they traded Smith? I read somewhere last off-season that if he had been traded, it would’ve cost more than cutting. I forgot the details because I knew they wouldn’t do it when he was injured.
 

Stakesarehigh

One day it will all make sense
44,889
29,346
1,033
Joined
Oct 8, 2016
Location
Cincinnati
Hoopla Cash
$ 77,957.12
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I’m not saying my above comment is realistic at all, but how much would Washington have to pay if they traded Smith? I read somewhere last off-season that if he had been traded, it would’ve cost more than cutting. I forgot the details because I knew they wouldn’t do it when he was injured.

His dead cap is like 8 million. With this roster I'd (if it were me) go with a veteran. Doesn't have to be Stafford necessarily but he's the best option that's realistic. I just can't see them piecing together a trade for Watson that competes with other teams.

Even in a down year for him he was middle of the pack as a qb. Get him and add a receiver imo.

Getting Stafford would give them four years or so to find a replacement.

Sorry to chime in on your team threads but not a lot of decent content going right now
 

MHSL82

Well-Known Member
17,033
979
113
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.92
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
His dead cap is like 8 million. With this roster I'd (if it were me) go with a veteran. Doesn't have to be Stafford necessarily but he's the best option that's realistic. I just can't see them piecing together a trade for Watson that competes with other teams.

Even in a down year for him he was middle of the pack as a qb. Get him and add a receiver imo.

Getting Stafford would give them four years or so to find a replacement.

Sorry to chime in on your team threads but not a lot of decent content going right now
Thanks, cutting him is 10.8 million cap. But trade may be different.
 

Skin'EmAll

Celebrity Troublemaker
4,896
1,703
173
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Location
FedEx Field
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Dean, pls tell me why you think Mathew Stafford is a good fit in WASH at this current moment? keep in mind he would basically be a 2 year rental, then what? Pls explain Stafford's fit, the plan moving forward to groom his replacement when he leaves and what talent you can put around him this year in order to make the playoffs to have any shot at a SB this coming season and next before he becomes a FA once more. A real plan that will give other fans confidence we are not wasting draft picks on Stafford who at 33 is beginning to decline, as is his mobility as is his years left of service.

Waiting.....


I'm usually rolling with Dean's thought process even when its unorthodox, but S2W brings up a legitimate question.
Is Stafford really a good fit, especially for what it will cost? I'm not denying Stafford is above average even in his early 30's
but unless he's someone that we could beat the Saints, or Packers with deep in the playoffs, maybe its worth developing a draft pick
or getting a cheaper FA while still building thru the draft. The NFC in general appears to be crumbling before our eyes, while this team appears to be on the rise.
 

Stakesarehigh

One day it will all make sense
44,889
29,346
1,033
Joined
Oct 8, 2016
Location
Cincinnati
Hoopla Cash
$ 77,957.12
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Thanks, cutting him is 10.8 million cap. But trade may be different.

About the only way I see someone wanting Smith is if they think they can get him and a rookie (like the lions would) and have his main focus being making that kid better. But id think the burden of taking on one of (if not the highest) the biggest backup qb contracts in the league would cost extra in draft capital.
 

MHSL82

Well-Known Member
17,033
979
113
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.92
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I'm usually rolling with Dean's thought process even when its unorthodox, but S2W brings up a legitimate question.
Is Stafford really a good fit, especially for what it will cost? I'm not denying Stafford is above average even in his early 30's
but unless he's someone that we could beat the Saints, or Packers with deep in the playoffs, maybe its worth developing a draft pick
or getting a cheaper FA while still building thru the draft. The NFC in general appears to be crumbling before our eyes, while this team appears to be on the rise.

If not going with Smith, I’d go with Allen, Heinicke, and draft the best pick you can at number 19 (QB or not), or trade up if QB is in reach that you want.

The reason is that I think that you guys can win the division next year with any of those three quarterbacks, Smith, Heinicke, or Allen. But the window isn’t there to contend unless you got someone better than Stafford.

Or rather, let’s say Allen is in the system already and gets onto the ground running due to familiarity and gets as far as Stafford, who hasn‘t won a playoff game, would.

Let’s say you don’t believe in any of the three: Smith teaches the next guy or Allen maximizes young development by not costing the team in play or money, and all that you would lose in not getting Stafford (first or second round exit) you gain in picks and development (including QB pick maybe).
 

MHSL82

Well-Known Member
17,033
979
113
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.92
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
About the only way I see someone wanting Smith is if they think they can get him and a rookie (like the lions would) and have his main focus being making that kid better. But id think the burden of taking on one of (if not the highest) the biggest backup qb contracts in the league would cost extra in draft capital.

Smith would start that year and the rookie would sit and learn and get in if there’s an injury. So the cost is the same, but hopefully instead of a high backup pay, they are paying for some starts.
 

rmilia1

Well-Known Member
45,778
11,977
1,033
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Location
iowa
Hoopla Cash
$ 86,060.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I don't get the hesitation on Stafford from people. The guy is easily a top 10-12 QB and obviously would be far better in a place where he has more talent than he had in Detroit. You've got about a 10% chance of drafting a QB 1st round who ends up a better QB than Stafford and that number of 10% doesn't mean that young guy will be better right away, just eventually.
 

deanpet21

Well-Known Member
22,528
1,910
173
Joined
Jul 19, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Dean, pls tell me why you think Mathew Stafford is a good fit in WASH at this current moment? keep in mind he would basically be a 2 year rental, then what? Pls explain Stafford's fit, the plan moving forward to groom his replacement when he leaves and what talent you can put around him this year in order to make the playoffs to have any shot at a SB this coming season and next before he becomes a FA once more. A real plan that will give other fans confidence we are not wasting draft picks on Stafford who at 33 is beginning to decline, as is his mobility as is his years left of service.

Waiting.....

With our defense we should be in win now mode. If Rodgers, Brees, and Brady retires it makes even more sense. If its a 2 year rental and we get 10-12 wins a year for two years I would take it. He should want to come here. It's the easiest path to the playoffs. You can get him his #1 Wr Galloday in FA. Plus you get get him another weapon in the draft. Do you think Tampa Bay is worrying what to do after T. brady?

Draft picks bust all the time this is a proven QB that can win for us right away. I was for the Alex Smith trade and I am for the Stafford trade.
 

skinsdad62

US ARMY retired /mod.
103,971
20,310
1,033
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Location
ada mi
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Funny one poster (me) said stafford could be expensive
 

Skin'EmAll

Celebrity Troublemaker
4,896
1,703
173
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Location
FedEx Field
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
If not going with Smith, I’d go with Allen, Heinicke, and draft the best pick you can at number 19 (QB or not), or trade up if QB is in reach that you want.

The reason is that I think that you guys can win the division next year with any of those three quarterbacks, Smith, Heinicke, or Allen. But the window isn’t there to contend unless you got someone better than Stafford.

Or rather, let’s say Allen is in the system already and gets onto the ground running due to familiarity and gets as far as Stafford, who hasn‘t won a playoff game, would.

Let’s say you don’t believe in any of the three: Smith teaches the next guy or Allen maximizes young development by not costing the team in play or money, and all that you would lose in not getting Stafford (first or second round exit) you gain in picks and development (including QB pick maybe).

i was just expressing the same thing in another thread. i agree with using what we've already got and even drafting Lance, im not a fan of him but think he could work in this system, put some FAs around him. I really like Alex Smith but he's gotta be more aggressive and i don't think he'll survive 16 games
 

skinsdad62

US ARMY retired /mod.
103,971
20,310
1,033
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Location
ada mi
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
With our defense we should be in win now mode. If Rodgers, Brees, and Brady retires it makes even more sense. If its a 2 year rental and we get 10-12 wins a year for two years I would take it. He should want to come here. It's the easiest path to the playoffs. You can get him his #1 Wr Galloday in FA. Plus you get get him another weapon in the draft. Do you think Tampa Bay is worrying what to do after T. brady?

Draft picks bust all the time this is a proven QB that can win for us right away. I was for the Alex Smith trade and I am for the Stafford trade.
If we are in win mode now we will fail and not be a consistent winner. Mistake we always make
 

deanpet21

Well-Known Member
22,528
1,910
173
Joined
Jul 19, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I'm usually rolling with Dean's thought process even when its unorthodox, but S2W brings up a legitimate question.
Is Stafford really a good fit, especially for what it will cost? I'm not denying Stafford is above average even in his early 30's
but unless he's someone that we could beat the Saints, or Packers with deep in the playoffs, maybe its worth developing a draft pick
or getting a cheaper FA while still building thru the draft. The NFC in general appears to be crumbling before our eyes, while this team appears to be on the rise.

The big time QB;s in the NFL are retiring all the more you get Stafford. With our defense we should be in win now mode.
 
Top