KingKoolKat75
Well-Known Member
Michigan will probably be ranked this week.
btw what bowl game do you see Michigan going to this season after Ohio St. pushes your shit in.Winning the PAC isn’t an accomplishment — the last time the conference was relevant, Pete Carroll was the coach at USC.
btw what bowl game do you see Michigan going to this season after Ohio St. pushes your shit in.
You should probably pull for Wisconsin to win the BIG.
Michigan will probably be ranked this week.
btw what bowl game do you see Michigan going to this season after Ohio St. pushes your shit in.
As for the first CFP rankings, it will be Bama, Clemson, Georgia and ND in the top 4 with OSU 5 and Wisconsin 6. Arizona State will be 7th, amiright @AlaskaGuy?
If we aren't rewarding teams for consistency then why is everyone here voting a team number one who's best win is a 8 point win over 5-3 A&M?Their OOC schedule this year was a joke. It doesn't matter what they "consistently" schedule. There's no reason to reward that kind of schedule-padding, irrespective of how lousy the rest of your conference opponents are.
Yes this year it's bad . Regularly it's not .Bullshit. Pure and utter bullshit.
You give them an excuse for having a terrible conference schedule, which is fine. Then give them a pass for normally having a solid OOC. Florida Atlantic, Utah State, and BYU. There is nothing solid about that. Further, they had Washington scheduled for a H/H and originally for '17/'18, changed it once to '18/'21 and the dumped it all together. This wasn't done to them, they did it to themselves.
They aren't alone with bullshit schedules. Quite a few ranked teams have nothing but garbage and that trend will likely continue to grow given you can get ranked highly without ever having to actually play a team with a pulse so why wouldn't it become more the norm?
Washington's is bad, Wisconsin's is terrible, hell Bama's is bad given that FSU is pure trash this year.
Call it what it is and stop making excuses for it.
If we aren't rewarding teams for consistency then why is everyone here voting a team number one who's best win is a 8 point win over 5-3 A&M?
Well I'd say that's consistency . And I'd agree. I'm asking why some are picking and choosing when to apply that logic.3 CFP appearances out of 3 chances, 3-2 in those appearances and a natty could be why
This makes no sense.If we aren't rewarding teams for consistency then why is everyone here voting a team number one who's best win is a 8 point win over 5-3 A&M?
Yes dipshit, learn to read. I said ours wasn't good either.Is a Washington fan really talking about someone having a cupcake schedule?
I don't remember why they originally dropped the first deal when it was for 17 and 18 and changed it to 18 and 21, but in any event they still set their own OOC and put BYU as their best game. BYU happens to suck ass. There are quite a few ranked teams that are similar victims of their own scheduling in the same way. So far the committee hasn't really made teams pay for it.I think the Washington game was a victim of the Big Ten's switch to a 9 game conference schedule.
What do those two things have to do with each other? I mean Washington played LSU and Boise State when they were good in recent years, but it doesn't change they have crap right now. The why doesn't change things either.Yes this year it's bad . Regularly it's not .
Their OOC schedule this year was a joke. It doesn't matter what they "consistently" schedule. There's no reason to reward that kind of schedule-padding, irrespective of how lousy the rest of your conference opponents are.
Yes dipshit, learn to read. I said ours wasn't good either.
You really are fucking retarded.