huskers1217
Well-Known Member
I miss the OU/Nebraska game every year.
curious to hear a Sooners perspective. If you had to choose. RRSO or thanksgiving vs Nebraska
I miss the OU/Nebraska game every year.
Every conference would find a way to take a Texas OU packages. Everyone.
Sorry man back to the Big East for you and keep searching for that “cultural fit”.Short answer, yes.
I dont really have a problem with the programs we play in the Big12 as far as culture ect. I think we all fit pretty well with each other but WVU fits better geographically in the SEC/ACC/BIG a heluvalot better than the Big12 as far as physical location and in some ways culturally.
Now I DO like alot of the teams we play as far as opponents better than the old BigEast but CFB is and will always be better regionally than nationally so... in a perfect world I’d rather play teams closer to us.
If the SEC expands it will be for a NC or Virginia team.You’re half right.
We’d gladly take OU...
If the SEC expands it will be for a NC or Virginia team.
No way Oklahoma wants any part of the SEC.
I actually wish the SEC would take OU and Okie State because that would guarantee Auburn would move to the east and it would severely screw you guys.SHHHHHHHHHHH.
(I was taking a shot at Texas. Don’t tell Neil, though. He might take time away from finding Waldo.)
I actually wish the SEC would take OU and Okie State because that would guarantee Auburn would move to the east and it would severely screw you guys.
We would drop LSU and pick up KY, Vandy, SC and Mizzou. You guys would have to drop the TN game and pick up OU every year. I can hear the whining from your fan base now.
You guys never get tired of pimping TN. So sad.Nah. Tennessee is on the way back. You and the rest of the conference would complain that we got Tennessee during their lean years and now you’re stuck with them during their strong ones.
You guys never get tired of pimping TN. So sad.
If I only get one, RRSO.curious to hear a Sooners perspective. If you had to choose. RRSO or thanksgiving vs Nebraska
Do you really feel a "true champion" hasn't been named? I'd like to go back also but the only time I felt like the SEC Champion wasn't a true champion was in 1993 when Auburn beat both Bama and Florida but couldn't play in the championship game because of probation. Other than that I think it all pretty much worked out.Yeah, I miss the 10 team format because I liked that everyone played everyone else. Gave a true conference champion.
Do you really feel a "true champion" hasn't been named? I'd like to go back also but the only time I felt like the SEC Champion wasn't a true champion was in 1993 when Auburn beat both Bama and Florida but couldn't play in the championship game because of probation. Other than that I think it all pretty much worked out.
I can't think of a time when the PAC champ didn't win it on the field.
Interesting. I heard a discussion regarding the Delaney retirement the other day and this came up. From this discussion, the B1G was the first to seek expansion. Delaney and university presidents first choice was to land North Carolina, Virginia and Georgia Tech. While I understood the academic side of it, Georgia Tech seemed like a strange choice. Until I remembered it was in Atlanta. Then I woke up.If the SEC expands it will be for a NC or Virginia team.
No way Oklahoma wants any part of the SEC.
Odd I remember OU&Texas agreed to a deal with the pac, then Scott comes back and tell us the money not there - so Texas and OU see a deal they agreed to fall apart. Neither has trusted Scott again.
Ou and Texas will always be in the same conference. To much money on the table for either of them to strike out on their own.Because I’m sure when 2024 comes and the big xii implodes, OU wants to save the RRSO as an OOC
Everyone does, that one like many others, should be played yearly OOC.I miss the OU/Nebraska game every year.
It’s all about populations and Virginia and NC are loaded.Interesting. I heard a discussion regarding the Delaney retirement the other day and this came up. From this discussion, the B1G was the first to seek expansion. Delaney and university presidents first choice was to land North Carolina, Virginia and Georgia Tech. While I understood the academic side of it, Georgia Tech seemed like a strange choice. Until I remembered it was in Atlanta. Then I woke up.
Strange how conference realignment ended up different than originally desired.
I agree 100%. And I think your explanation is exactly why the Big 12 stayed a 10 a couple of years ago.It’s all about populations and Virginia and NC are loaded.
Since cable is dying I’m not sure population of a state matters as much as fan base size now. It mattered before because you could charge a premium to all residents in that state for conference channels that had teams in that state regardless if they wanted it as long as they bought cable.
Cord cutting is killing that model so it gets a bit more interesting.
Oklahoma is now much more attractive than say a Missouri where they have 2 million more residents. Note success didn’t matter before and that’s why the B1G took Rutgers because it gave them New Jersey and brought the B1G channel package with them.
Conference expansion isn’t as black and white as it was 5 years ago.
curious to hear a Sooners perspective. If you had to choose. RRSO or thanksgiving vs Nebraska
If I only get one, RRSO.
Loved Thanksgiving Friday vs Nebraska when I was a kid.