Mitziman
i know you don't like to hear the truth, but...
A man should never, and I mean never slap, push or strike any women or child…unless of course they need it.
Yep.. and OJ was innocent, Zimmerman killed a kid in self defense. I never said that the abuse wasnt there. There likely were some serious issues in that house. But reality is, she got away with attempted murder. She cut his dick off while he was passed out drunk, drove down the road and tossed it out the window. Not a course of action you just come up with on the fly. As my original statement said, this country has been slowly brainwashed to see women as victims in need of protection. And thus a woman can get away with a crime that would get a man locked away for life.
I remember the morning after it happened. I was still wiping sleep out of my eyes when I caught the story in the local section of the Washington Post. When I got to the part about throwing the dick out the window I burst out laughing.
NoOK so let me ask you. If a man was being abused by his wife for years, both physically and emotionally. And he finally got to a breaking point and slashed her face with a razor after walking in on her and another man in his bed... would you also find this amusing??
So IM just doing a litmus check you realize.
Just to recap, it was funny what happened to Bobbit, but if the sexual roles were the only things reversed, it becomes tragic, wrong and unacceptable.
This sir is my point all along that society at large has adopted the idea that women are victims and justified in retaliatory acts of violence against men. But flip the role and it becomes a taboo.
Some where in there is a long and in-depth study on society in its current form.
It was funny because it was a funny ass story. If we reverse the roles it is a different situation because, this just in, woman have been the victims of abuse far more often than men have. So put that with the obvious difference in physical strength and the rules are different for a reason. Is it fair? Or course not, and I'm not defending a woman going around physically abusing her man. But it's certainly understandable.
Mrs. Bobbit got off because the courts ruled that she was not in a sound state of mind after years of abuse. When you picture a woman running out of the house with a dick in her hand, only to realize and throw it out the window later, well that sounds like a woman who was not in clear state of mind to me. Put that with the total piece of shit that is John Wayne Bobbit and I"m cool with the outcome.
So was years of physical and verbal abuse all part of her master plan too?
It was funny because it was a funny ass story. If we reverse the roles it is a different situation because, this just in, woman have been the victims of abuse far more often than men have. So put that with the obvious difference in physical strength and the rules are different for a reason. Is it fair? Or course not, and I'm not defending a woman going around physically abusing her man. But it's certainly understandable.
Mrs. Bobbit got off because the courts ruled that she was not in a sound state of mind after years of abuse. When you picture a woman running out of the house with a dick in her hand, only to realize and throw it out the window later, well that sounds like a woman who was not in clear state of mind to me. Put that with the total piece of shit that is John Wayne Bobbit and I"m cool with the outcome.
There is no evidence to support the statement that women have been the victims of abuse far more often than men have. Now if you had stated that women have REPORTED abuse far more often than men, I would agree with that. I have professional experience in this regard.
That might have a little something to do with the fact that if a guy walks into the police station and says... "My wife just hit me with a frying pan, and I simply can not put up with it any more." The police will likely first look at him as if he were a soft punk, and secondly ask him.... what did you do, sleep with her best friend to deserve such "abuse"?
There were many times that I would interview couples, where the dominate responders were female. When separated that reluctance that you spoke of was clearly evident and not easily talked about without quite a bit of prodding. In cases where there was some form of abuse, nearly 85% never returned for a second visit.
Define abuse. If you are talking about physical abuse, which was the case here, I highly doubt woman deliver more blows than they absorb.
As for Shark's theory that it was a green card marriage even if it was does that mean the wife deserves abuse? Can you not see how she may think "if I just stick it out for another 19 months I can get my card"? I just think it's a reach to conclude that she went from that to "June 3 is the day, on June 3rd I get to cut his dick off".
Define abuse. If you are talking about physical abuse, which was the case here, I highly doubt woman deliver more blows than they absorb.
As for Shark's theory that it was a green card marriage even if it was does that mean the wife deserves abuse? Can you not see how she may think "if I just stick it out for another 19 months I can get my card"? I just think it's a reach to conclude that she went from that to "June 3 is the day, on June 3rd I get to cut his dick off".
I will say this, if you dont think the act of cutting off a mans whacker is a very premeditated act, I cant help you. Most people in a fit of rage might stab some one, or shoot them. Hell I will even give the burning bed chick a pass, because she clearly intended to KILL him. She wanted him dead, and worse she wanted him to suffer as he died. Only after she committed the act did it dawn on her that jail time for assault is less than jail time for murder. And make no mistake, if she had left him to bleed out, temporary insanity would have been off the table.
Love how you write this as if you can read her mind. You don't know it was premeditate any more than I know it wasn't.