- Thread starter
- #1
I don't see how but I'll take it.I wasn't sure if I was reading Bull Shit or not. A 4rth for Parnell??
I'm normally of the opinion that it isn't that big of a deal, or at least not as big as some make it out to be. The first place schedule is based on the previous year, not the "current" year so who knows how good teams will be. Look at Wash (last place) and Dallas (first place) going into in 2015. Going into this year a team would rather have played wash, but it didn't work out that way. So for 2015 the first place schedule meant little. But, going into 2016 if you ask me if I'd rather play Carolina and Az or TB and SF...yes it looks like a big deal right now for the NFC East teams.You have to be excited with 5 in the top 140 with the success McClay and Stephen has had the last few years. Add in the Cowboys ability to coach at the Senior Bowl, and enough cap room to be players in FA, and it could be a great off-season. I also saw some of the Redskins Homers poo pooing the difference between a first and last place schedule being "only two games". It's still huge
Especially in a division that's usually decided by one gameI'm normally of the opinion that it isn't that big of a deal, or at least not as big as some make it out to be. The first place schedule is based on the previous year, not the "current" year so who knows how good teams will be. Look at Wash (last place) and Dallas (first place) going into in 2015. Going into this year a team would rather have played wash, but it didn't work out that way. So for 2015 the first place schedule meant little. But, going into 2016 if you ask me if I'd rather play Carolina and Az or TB and SF...yes it looks like a big deal right now for the NFC East teams.
It has to do with the contracts they signed vs the ones we signed, I believe.I wasn't sure if I was reading Bull Shit or not. A 4rth for Parnell??
The exact formula has never been disclosed and seems a little vague...but contract amount AND playing time are two huge pieces...It has to do with the contracts they signed vs the ones we signed, I believe.
Dang I was thinking Hardy's contract wouldn't count against us, but now that I think back he wasn't cut. He just wasn't resigned. CRUD. All the more reason to hate that prick, he cost us a 4th round pick. And for what?? A circus and 6 sacks? I'd rather have the 4th.
Im sure there must be a logical explanation of why they didnt just cut his ass, before the end of the season but I don't recall exactly why that was. Im tired of his act and he can kick rocks as far as Im concerned