kbso83432
Well-Known Member
I guess they feel they cannot get more than a 3rd for him, so they might as well use him this year and get a comp 3rd next year.I have been saying this all along. We will not give him huge money in FA
I guess they feel they cannot get more than a 3rd for him, so they might as well use him this year and get a comp 3rd next year.I have been saying this all along. We will not give him huge money in FA
I guess they feel they cannot get more than a 3rd for him, so they might as well use him this year and get a comp 3rd next year.
If this is the case, deal him right now. Stop doing bad business by settling for a 3rd next year. You did the same with Schreff. Just terrible football business. You can get a 2nd for Payne today and teams would line up for his services right now. I would ask for a 2nd and a player of need for Payne.
Teams would line up to give a 2nd for Payne! Our FO is being stubborn and doing bad business as usual.I guess they feel they cannot get more than a 3rd for him, so they might as well use him this year and get a comp 3rd next year.
Teams would line up to give a 2nd for Payne! Our FO is being stubborn and doing bad business as usual.
there is nothing you can do now , if you trade him your front 4 takes a huge hit with chase not coming back till week 7 , mathis is riding a bike now and you let to dt's walk . this defense is lucky to be a top 25 defense with payne much less without himI agree if there was a 2nd round pick offered we should take it but you don't know if it was offered.
I have said this for a few years now and was called out for it. We need a real GM here to assist and lead the front office; we don't need "yes men" reporting to Rivera. Rivera has no clue what he is doing and nobody has ever provided evidence to convince me otherwise. He should have brought a GM with him as Andy Reid did.another FO botch job
You are correct, but Dan has changed operations models during his ownership:In 23 years Dan has never signed an actual GM unless you consider Vinny Cerrato or Bruce Allen. I don't disagree that he would be wise to have one but why would you think he would change how he does business at this point?
Point taken so trade him now and get value. Don't fuk around because your stubborn and think 20 defensively looks better than 25. Trade him because if you don't you get less next off season and that is not how you improve your assets or team.there is nothing you can do now , if you trade him your front 4 takes a huge hit with chase not coming back till week 7 , mathis is riding a bike now and you let to dt's walk . this defense is lucky to be a top 25 defense with payne much less without him
I have an idea , how about you resign him ? We have the money , it’s about choice .Point taken so trade him now and get value. Don't fuk around because your stubborn and think 20 defensively looks better than 25. Trade him because if you don't you get less next off season and that is not how you improve your assets or team.
They won't resign because Sweat is due after then CY. We CAN replace Payne however. Mathis and Brown (came in this week for a look-see) would do this year. Hell, you have no LB'ers currently so keeping Payne won't make much difference anyway. Trade him for more assets!I have an idea , how about you resign him ? We have the money , it’s about choice .
If you want him to walk then fine , keep settle and or ionman but don’t let all of that
go and then decide a rookie and a career bum will make the unit better
While I agree that LB will not have a major role in the defense, we literally have the worst LB corps. in the NFL. Talent and depth are major concerns. Rivera was allegedly going to bring in reinforcements. Perhaps he is waiting for cuts? If Holcomb goes down, thats it for us!They won't resign because Sweat is due after then CY. We CAN replace Payne however. Mathis and Brown (came in this week for a look-see) would do this year. Hell, you have no LB'ers currently so keeping Payne won't make much difference anyway. Trade him for more assets!
I understand what you are saying, I confirmed that. What I told you is Dan isn't going to do what you want him to do. Doesn't mean I am agreeing with Dan's FO model, it is what it is. I didn't want Joe Gibbs making personnel decsions other than who to keep and coaching them up.You are correct, but Dan has changed operations models during his ownership:
1. Jerry Jones model (owner is GM) = failed
2. Yes Man GM Model (Bruce) = failed
3. Coach-Centric model (Rivera) = failing
The only other model I can think of is the traditional GM model. Maybe the Andy Reid model where he has a separation of duties (Veach) model can be considered one? I am probably wrong though.
I admit I am probably wrong, but since Dan has tried multiple systems and they have failed, he will hopefully get tired of losing and want to change yet again. Perhaps Dan or Tanya will realize they need change and hire a true GM. I can only hope!
I'm in agreement that position has been neglected.While I agree that LB will not have a major role in the defense, we literally have the worst LB corps. in the NFL. Talent and depth are major concerns. Rivera was allegedly going to bring in reinforcements. Perhaps he is waiting for cuts? If Holcomb goes down, thats it for us!
Be careful with your attitude. The Sunshine and Rainbows police will pull you over. We must stay positive and ignore the facts.Bottom line, nobody wants to re-sign in DC. They don't see promise, a plan, or a FO that works.