jstewismybastardson
Lord Shitlord aka El cibernauta
Jimbo2s preference is to re-sign Lindholm long term
Jimbo2s preference is to re-sign Lindholm long term
on a scary thought.Petey to Chicago E4
thats what everyone has been thinking when the rumours came up last week.on a scary thought.
maybe Petey DOESNT want to sign long term here and Lindholm is insurance.
He's not going to say otherwise at this point.Jimbo2s preference is to re-sign Lindholm long term
Y'all still covet Kent Johnson? Asking for a bald, Finnish friend.on a scary thought.
maybe Petey DOESNT want to sign long term here and Lindholm is insurance.
he went on to say both ... that he could be re-signed or just be a rental ... diplomatic responseHe's not going to say otherwise at this point.
Lets maybe wait until he plays a game
for Lindholms rights before UFA day ... done! Lets hope the idiot Finn is on board!Y'all still covet Kent Johnson? Asking for a bald, Finnish friend.
That would actually be right up his alley. Trade assets for a 30 year old just so he can sign him to that 8th year when if he would sign here he could be had for "free" a few days later.for Lindholms rights before UFA day ... done! Lets hope the idiot Finn is on board!
OK, that's funny.the timing....
I read that before deletion and frankly it was a stupid read lolOK, that's funny.
The post saying "Why the Canucks should not trade for Lindholm" from YESTERDAY, is gone.
Here's today
I think Eddie likes it
Saw today that Bains might get called up for the 5 game road trip after the ahl asg. deserves it