Just a reminder that there's going to be cuts to Social Security and health care (you know, things that are pretty important to average Americans) in order for McCarthy to be Speaker of the House.
How much of that missing $1 trillion is due to inefficiency in the existing department and how much of the $78 billion allocated in the legislation will actually make a dent in that $1 trillion when time again the IRS has shown they go after the poorest of Americans in their crackdowns instead of the highest bracket earners (IRS Continues Targeting Poorest Families for More Tax Audits During FY 2022)
What could you buy with a trillion bucks? That almost completely funds Sanders' single payer health care system. It is said to cost 14 trillion over a decade. That's one third of the FULL infrastructure bill proposed by Biden. Every bridge in America fixed, renewable energy and broadband in every home.
I would look at more things that could be bought with a tril a year, but it's causing my blood pressure to spike, And I don't have good health care. I have private health insurance.
And who would be against the idea of providing more jobs in the IRS? Who could POSSIBLY object? And who that objects could possibly have the sway over McCarthy to make it happen? WHO
How much of that missing $1 trillion is due to inefficiency in the existing department and how much of the $78 billion allocated in the legislation will actually make a dent in that $1 trillion when time again the IRS has shown they go after the poorest of Americans in their crackdowns instead of the highest bracket earners (IRS Continues Targeting Poorest Families for More Tax Audits During FY 2022)
Trudeau govt gave the CRA a mandate to try and do likewise and all they’ve been doing is going harder on small businesses instead of bigger companies like, say, SNC or Bombardier. Give the IRS another $78 billy and I would assume the same will happen. Can’t have those pesky small businesses getting in the way of Walmart, after all.
Don’t have to like these people but tax collectors have all the resources they need to do their jobs, they’re just a massive bloated bureaucratic mess designed to avoid the biggest tax cheats in lieu of making examples of lower earners. Their budget should be cut, not expanded by such a grotesque sum.
We also have one of the world's most complicated tax codes and the world's largest series of capital markets, which means that not only is the agents to taxpayers ratio real high, but they're also covering more complicated things like the tax code or extremely complex corporate returns.I love these kind of discussions because I don't know much about tax administrative from the standpoint of efficiency and I always research and learn things from primary sources. 'Do they have enough people? How do they compare to other developed nations?' were my thoughts after reading your post.
Turns out they generally don't (assuming the average of developed nations is efficient, still don't know enough to say otherwise, but the chart at this link is interesting (page 66):
https://www.oecd.org/tax/forum-on-t...cations-and-products/comparative/CIS-2004.pdf
Looks like the US has about 1 tax worker for every 2,261 citizens with the avg. among OECD nations at just under 1,000. Canada has 1 for every 810 citizens for example. Only 2 other developed nations with a worse ratio than the US. So I think it's fair to say we are at least likely understaffed, and possibly VERY understaffed.
Search for Texas vigilante who fatally shot robbery suspect carrying fake gun
Man fired nine shots and then helped diners recover the money at the Houston taqueria restaurant before disappearingwww.theguardian.com
Per that chart most of the other countries’ employees also do that country’s property and/or motor vehicle fees (although the US is the only one that had a 15% reduction in staff from 1993-2001 - the Clintons are undefeated).I love these kind of discussions because I don't know much about tax administrative from the standpoint of efficiency and I always research and learn things from primary sources. 'Do they have enough people? How do they compare to other developed nations?' were my thoughts after reading your post.
Turns out they generally don't (assuming the average of developed nations is efficient, still don't know enough to say otherwise, but the chart at this link is interesting (page 66):
https://www.oecd.org/tax/forum-on-t...cations-and-products/comparative/CIS-2004.pdf
Looks like the US has about 1 tax worker for every 2,261 citizens with the avg. among OECD nations at just under 1,000. Canada has 1 for every 810 citizens for example. Only 2 other developed nations with a worse ratio than the US. So I think it's fair to say we are at least likely understaffed, and possibly VERY understaffed.
The narrative is that he campaigned on overturning all of Trump's border policies and thus by winning convinced migrants to flock to the border, overwhelming authorities.Biden went to visit the border in El Paso to see first hand the ongoing situation there and meet with authorities to find out what they need. Greg Abbot showed up and said the visit is two years too late. "He should have been here from day one to fix the problem he created".
Ummmm, how could he fix a problem "he created" if he came down on "day one"? If the problem existed on day one, then he didn't create it.
Per that chart most of the other countries’ employees also do that country’s property and/or motor vehicle fees (although the US is the only one that had a 15% reduction in staff from 1993-2001 - the Clintons are undefeated).
It says on some other charts there that a lot of those employees from other countries also admin benefit programs, including Canada. The US is also one of the few countries on that list that doesn’t have to admin a federal VAT.