• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Coaches perspective on CFP, conference championship games, scheduling

Rolltide94

Well-Known Member
9,117
1,612
173
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 119.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Some interesting quotes in here. Coach O, Saban and Chipper decided not to reply.

I was surprised that some of the coaches against expansion are those that would likely benefit and vice versa.
 

BamaDude

Well-Known Member
3,975
884
113
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Of the 30 coaches that are for expansion, only 8 or 9 of them have:
a) Led a team to the playoffs in the past; or,
b) Likely to lead a team to the playoffs in the future.
 

Deep Creek

Well-Known Member
14,950
3,641
293
Joined
Aug 26, 2015
Hoopla Cash
$ 200.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Of the 30 coaches that are for expansion, only 8 or 9 of them have:
a) Led a team to the playoffs in the past; or,
b) Likely to lead a team to the playoffs in the future.
Who do you consider the 8 or 9?
 

Stakesarehigh

One day it will all make sense
38,591
23,856
1,033
Joined
Oct 8, 2016
Location
Cincinnati
Hoopla Cash
$ 77,957.12
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Of the 30 coaches that are for expansion, only 8 or 9 of them have:
a) Led a team to the playoffs in the past; or,
b) Likely to lead a team to the playoffs in the future.

How you figure that?

Like six of them already have... You got Day beyond that and then guys that were very close recently or closing out the BCS era

Going to 8 would mean Utah almost certainly goes to the CFP if they won out as an example
 

Stakesarehigh

One day it will all make sense
38,591
23,856
1,033
Joined
Oct 8, 2016
Location
Cincinnati
Hoopla Cash
$ 77,957.12
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
8 would mean Baylor controls it's destiny (which it still kind of does now anyway.... Not that I think they will win out but it would be way more likely for them to lose once and then surprise OU in the CCG)
 

cwalke3408

Well-Known Member
4,041
1,173
173
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Location
ATL
Hoopla Cash
$ 8.57
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Dabo Swinney, Clemson: Everybody focuses on the playoff games and the national championship. The way we have it right now, every game we have, especially once we were positioned, every game was a playoff game. Every game. Duke was a playoff game. South Carolina was a playoff game. Pitt was a playoff game. We have layers of playoffs. The more you expand, the less the season matters, especially if a team so-called already in the playoff, well, now you're going to have people not playing guys, just like you have in all these other sports. All of a sudden, games don't matter because everybody is just playing for the playoff and they're in. What we have is the best of both worlds.

source.gif


Beautiful, couldn't have said it any better
 

gob

Well-Known Member
28,849
7,597
533
Joined
Oct 6, 2016
Location
there
Hoopla Cash
$ 13,496.29
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I think Babers stated what is probably behind their opposition to expansion.

Dino Babers, Syracuse: If it expands, I think it gives a huge advantage to the traditional powers. If you want a Cinderella team to win it one of these times, you can't have a Cinderella team going against traditional powers more than two weeks in a row. If it's three weeks, or four weeks of contests, it's going to be so physical, there's going to be so much carnage going on, that a team that doesn't have a lot of depth will never win it.
Yeah, it was nice seeing the Cinderella UCF team have that chance to win it....no Cinderella will ever win a 4 team playoff, because no Cinderella will ever make a 4 team playoff.
 

BamaDude

Well-Known Member
3,975
884
113
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Who do you consider the 8 or 9?

First, the been there, done that crew:
Mark Dantonio, Michigan St., once, but probably won't get back there again.
Brian Kelly, Notre Dame, once, and may get back again in the future.
Chris Petersen, Washington, once, but will have trouble getting back.

The searchers:
Ryan Day, Ohio St. - seems like a lock to get there (probably more than once).
James Franklin, Penn St. - could get there.
Chris Klieman, Kansas St. - has a shot if he can keep developing his program.
Gus Malzahn, Auburn - a longshot, but still a shot (if he can keep his job).
Max Rhule, Baylor - has a shot.
Kyle Whittingham, Utah - another longshot, but still a possibility.

A 10th coach that could possibly crash the party one day is Scott Satterfield at Louisville.
 

Stakesarehigh

One day it will all make sense
38,591
23,856
1,033
Joined
Oct 8, 2016
Location
Cincinnati
Hoopla Cash
$ 77,957.12
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I'm not following how games suddenly don't matter
First, the been there, done that crew:
Mark Dantonio, Michigan St., once, but probably won't get back there again.
Brian Kelly, Notre Dame, once, and may get back again in the future.
Chris Petersen, Washington, once, but will have trouble getting back.

The searchers:
Ryan Day, Ohio St. - seems like a lock to get there (probably more than once).
James Franklin, Penn St. - could get there.
Chris Klieman, Kansas St. - has a shot if he can keep developing his program.
Gus Malzahn, Auburn - a longshot, but still a shot (if he can keep his job).
Max Rhule, Baylor - has a shot.
Kyle Whittingham, Utah - another longshot, but still a possibility.

A 10th coach that could possibly crash the party one day is Scott Satterfield at Louisville.

Jimbo was there
Mack won a title
Les won a title
Gundy would've been in under a four team in 11
Patterson was right there in 14
Shaw was close in 15
Leach would've been in with a eight team with Crabtree


I get Les and Mack are exceptionally unlikely to do it again but we are talking perspective.

Even Taggart (now fired) would have a real good chance if he wasn't a shitty coach.

Obviously Miami has been very good in years past.
 

BamaDude

Well-Known Member
3,975
884
113
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I'm not following how games suddenly don't matter


Jimbo was there (Oops! Forgot about that first-round pasting from 2014.)
Mack won a title (But not in the playoffs!)
Les won a title (But not in the playoffs!)
Gundy would've been in under a four team in 11
Patterson was right there in 14
Shaw was close in 15
Leach would've been in with a eight team with Crabtree


I get Les and Mack are exceptionally unlikely to do it again but we are talking perspective.

Even Taggart (now fired) would have a real good chance if he wasn't a shitty coach. (Seriously?)

Obviously Miami has been very good in years past.
 

cwalke3408

Well-Known Member
4,041
1,173
173
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Location
ATL
Hoopla Cash
$ 8.57
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
upload_2019-11-5_17-47-35.png

:spit:Almost didn't scroll down enough to see this gem
 

Stakesarehigh

One day it will all make sense
38,591
23,856
1,033
Joined
Oct 8, 2016
Location
Cincinnati
Hoopla Cash
$ 77,957.12
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
We are talking about perspective of coaches. I'm not sure why it matters if they made the current version of the playoffs or the even more restrictive version previously


Yes any coach with a pulse should be competing for playoffs at FSU. Again....that would be the perspective of the coach.

We go to 8 and it opens the field up substantially.


Personally I'm ok with six but I can see 8 being the end result. I wouldn't want more than that.
 

Rolltide94

Well-Known Member
9,117
1,612
173
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 119.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I think the least we could do is play 10 P5 teams across the board

I'm down with that...playing 9 conference games doesn't do shit for me though. We need 8 and 2 for every P5.
 

Diego Roll Tide

Well-Known Member
11,997
7,363
533
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Location
Florence, AL
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Yeah, it was nice seeing the Cinderella UCF team have that chance to win it....no Cinderella will ever win a 4 team playoff, because no Cinderella will ever make a 4 team playoff.

Catch-22 for them. Add more teams and their chances of getting selected improve, but their chances of winning once in take a dive.

That said, any G5 should be in favor of expansion.
 

Diego Roll Tide

Well-Known Member
11,997
7,363
533
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Location
Florence, AL
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
We are talking about perspective of coaches. I'm not sure why it matters if they made the current version of the playoffs or the even more restrictive version previously


Yes any coach with a pulse should be competing for playoffs at FSU. Again....that would be the perspective of the coach.

We go to 8 and it opens the field up substantially.


Personally I'm ok with six but I can see 8 being the end result. I wouldn't want more than that.
I like 8. P5 champs get an autobid, then any unbeatens, and the remaining slots go to at large teams based on a BCS type of computation. The same computation could be used for seeding. No committee would be necessary.
 

BamaDude

Well-Known Member
3,975
884
113
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I like 8. P5 champs get an autobid, then any unbeatens, and the remaining slots go to at large teams based on a BCS type of computation. The same computation could be used for seeding. No committee would be necessary.

I don't like auto bids. You could end up with 3-loss (or worse) teams getting in just because they won their conference.
 
Top