- Thread starter
- #1
Yea their approach of no Oline or Dline is interesting to say the leastThat Seahawks DL is gonna be bigly ungood
I read that he wants to play in a 3-4, which I thought was strange.
I read that he wants to play in a 3-4, which I thought was strange. Seemed unnatural when he was doing that in HOU. He was billed as a straight 4-3 DE out of HS, chose USC over Bama because the latter ran a 3-4.
Guess he got used to it under Vrabel.
I don't see any report on whether it's a 1-year or not.
They're going to win their division most likely and have a pretty good argument for being the 3rd best team in the AFC after this move. Yeah they won't get the 1 seed, so what? They got a puncher's shot in the AFC.Go to a team who's not lucking their way to another AFCCG and who plays less inspired at home.
Sour grapes....Go to a team who's not lucking their way to another AFCCG and who plays less inspired at home.
Yea their approach of no Oline or Dline is interesting to say the least
They're going to win their division most likely and have a pretty good argument for being the 3rd best team in the AFC after this move. Yeah they won't get the 1 seed, so what? They got a puncher's shot in the AFC.
So basically he signed for what Seattle offered him. Oh well.
Literally all of them because wins and losses aren't predicted through discrete and binary outcomes per se. There's luck and variation involved, and Clowney impacts them now when he does and doesn't play.So here is Tennessee's predicted 7 losses before this deal
@Vikings
Steelers/Bills
Bears
Colts(1)
@Ravens (this is complicated. Either they or the Colts beat them)
@Packers
@Texans
So with this move, which of these games got affected?
So basically either all of them or none of them get effected.Literally all of them because wins and losses aren't predicted through discrete and binary outcomes per se. There's luck and variation involved, and Clowney impacts them now when he does and doesn't play.