CBS Fantasy League Official SMACK TALK Thread

[bksballer89]

LMAO

 

[True Lakers Fan]

you are nuts if you think that I'm falling for that line of Bologna I'm not giving up a 36.4 game player or two scrubs barely making 720 any player all of the players are good for the TFC spot big deal

 

[True Lakers Fan]

Here is the bottom line: Your theory of spreading the wealth doesn't work because I can get another G-F-C(already have to be honest) at 19 ppg + Lowry's 38.00 to = 57 points. Drummond at 17 + Boozer at 24.00 points per week to = 41. That is a 16 points per week loss. I might not be an expert in sports, but I audit numbers for living

 

[True Lakers Fan]

Now a reasonable trade would be Boozer for Blake - then I would have forward that's slightly better than what I have, and you would be able to move Gasol into the starting line up(why you started Boozer the loser instead of Gasol is beyond me), and give a point guard that replaces Wiggins(was you drunk when you picked him?) That would be the best I would consider

 

[thunderc]

Anyone going to pretend they understand this fubar scoring? I'm supposed to have 27 points for the day and for some reason I now have 17 points less than I started the day with. I hate points leagues.

 

[bksballer89]

You have 27

 

[bksballer89]

It's not good to look at your points while games are going on...plenty of changes usually would happen

 

[thunderc]

Alright I understand it now, it averages each guys points per game over the week. Which means it doesn't make a damn how many games you play a week. I guess I can understand this but it just seems nuts to me. Just a different way of doing things I guess.

 

[bksballer89]

Alright I understand it now, it averages each guys points per game over the week. Which means it doesn't make a damn how many games you play a week. I guess I can understand this but it just seems nuts to me. Just a different way of doing things I guess.

Yes this is correct....which is why I'm not hurt too much by Westbrook getting hurt this week because he had that big opening night game so I still got 30+ points from him

 

[thunderc]

Having a guy get hurt and miss games after you set your schedule and not have it hurt you just seems so wrong to me. Averages out great games and piss poor games, gives everyone a certificate of achievement instead of a true grade in my opinion. Oh well, will be fun anyway.

 

[wlk3]

Here is the bottom line: Your theory of spreading the wealth doesn't work because I can get another G-F-C(already have to be honest) at 19 ppg + Lowry's 38.00 to = 57 points. Drummond at 17 + Boozer at 24.00 points per week to = 41. That is a 16 points per week loss. I might not be an expert in sports, but I audit numbers for living

Pau is listed as a Center as is Bosh... I have no way of changing that even though both play Forward, that is the problem I have... The problem you have is being crazy...

As of today...

Boozer - 17fppg
Drummond - 24.33fppg

Lowry 34.67

My guys = 41.33

Your guy = 34.67

Now I'm no auditor but 41.33 seems to be bigger than 34.67... My gamble is Lowry has to stay healthy... Your gamble is Boozer stepping up and Drummond gets better... I see Boozer at 23fppg at least and Drummond at 28fppg by Dec and through the rest of the season...

 

[True Lakers Fan]

Pau is listed as a Center as is Bosh... I have no way of changing that even though both play Forward, that is the problem I have... The problem you have is being crazy...

As of today...

Boozer - 17fppg
Drummond - 24.33fppg

Lowry 34.67

My guys = 41.33

Your guy = 34.67

Now I'm no auditor but 41.33 seems to be bigger than 34.67... My gamble is Lowry has to stay healthy... Your gamble is Boozer stepping up and Drummond gets better... I see Boozer at 23fppg at least and Drummond at 28fppg by Dec and through the rest of the season...

The problem is I already have 10 players and I can't combine your two guys into one position for that 41 and I already have guys that get 17 of that 41, so my 34 still is better than Drummond @ 24 and I would have one two many guys on my roster and would have to drop one. You can try to spin it any way you want, but your trade makes me worse off than I am now -I ain't buying into it - sorry

 

[bksballer89]

Thunder you did pretty good this week.

Scored the 3rd most points but unfortunately for you, the guy you played was one of the 2 with more points than you

 

[bksballer89]

I made quick work of Hambombs & Crisper in the 2 leagues

 

[True Lakers Fan]

I might be crazy, but I am not crazy and stupid - if you think that your trade is better than crap as I have suggest, then tell me line up and what it should be and explain how it would be better, because If I lose Lowry, than I have to replace him with a scrub at 20 in the best possible case. I could replace the G-F-C with Drummond, but that only gives me 4 to 5 more points in that position and I lose 14 at the point guard and Boozer is not producing any better than what I already have.

 

[wlk3]

I might be crazy, but I am not crazy and stupid - if you think that your trade is better than crap as I have suggest, then tell me line up and what it should be and explain how it would be better, because If I lose Lowry, than I have to replace him with a scrub at 20 in the best possible case. I could replace the G-F-C with Drummond, but that only gives me 4 to 5 more points in that position and I lose 14 at the point guard and Boozer is not producing any better than what I already have.

Right now you got 1.33 point from your G-F-C... That's a bump of 23 pts
Gordon gave you 8.33 points at Forward... That's a bump of 8.67 pts
On your bench right now you have Blake... That's 17

24.33 + 17 + 17 = 58.33

34.67 + 8.33 + 1.33 = 44.67

That is assuming you use Blake... Boozer doesn't start picking up and Drummond doesn't improve... Again it's a risk for you that those goes don't brake out... It's a risk for me Lowry stays healthy...

 

[True Lakers Fan]

Right now you got 1.33 point from your G-F-C... That's a bump of 23 pts
Gordon gave you 8.33 points at Forward... That's a bump of 8.67 pts
On your bench right now you have Blake... That's 17

24.33 + 17 + 17 = 58.33

34.67 + 8.33 + 1.33 = 44.67

That is assuming you use Blake... Boozer doesn't start picking up and Drummond doesn't improve... Again it's a risk for you that those goes don't brake out... It's a risk for me Lowry stays healthy...

I don't think so, because right now I already have 34.67(Lowry) and 19 from the new G-F-C that I picked up to equal 53

Drummond is a center which I don't need, so that would move my G-F-C from 19 to 24. Even if the g-f-c drops to 17, that's only 4-5 improvement and that's washed out by having my point guard drop from 34 down to 20 off the free agents at the best. I already replaced Sessions at the gfc - I already know I can do better than that without giving up the best guard I got and Boozer is not any change from what I have. The problem is Bosh and Gasol were listed as centers instead of forwards. I saw that and didn't go out there getting to many centers, but I picked up a couple of bad players based on faulty projections by cbs. There is no way you can take 17 from Boozer and add it twice. 17 is still 17 even in new math they are teaching your kids

 

[True Lakers Fan]

WLK - your numbers would have a point except that the 32 gain from Sessions and Gordon replacing those two would cost me 50% of the 34.67 from Lowry which would drop to 17 to 20 on a lucky day, so that's drops the 32 gain to 15


On the other hand


Wiliams replaces Gordon might bring me up from 8 to 15
and Svd takes me from 1 to 15


That brings me up 22 points without losing my point guard and that's a better option than giving up a 35 + guard with a huge amount of assists. I know enough about this now to not be giving up a player like Lowry for scrubs and the two guys you offered are scrubs. Three scrubs combined still don't equal that one super-star - just ask the Lakers - they've been trying that for the last three years and it's gotten them no where

 

[True Lakers Fan]

I will take the risk Lowry stays healthy by the way - I still think it's worth taking.

 

[wlk3]

TLF,

What is your purpose here...? You're talking about switching out 8 points with a guy who gets 17... You scored 216 points last week... You're not looking for 1 player who can get you 17 to put you over... Your team is SHIT!!! You MUST take chances... Because CBs is fucking retarded I have a 30 point guy on my bench because he's listed at C when we all know he's a Forward yet they have Jordan Hill at Forward and he plays C... Because of this I too must take chances... I offer you 2 guys who potentially can get 30+ for you for a guy we know will get 30+ but has played 82 games once in 10 years 70+ 3 times, which means the other 6 years it's 60 or less... Those are the risks...

By the way I didn't say count Boozer twice... I said you had Blake on your bench who scored 17... If you'd made the trade then you would need to start another guard... Please try to keep up because the shit you're saying is nonsense... You need forwards... Duncan is going to miss games and sit 4th quarters in blow outs... You really need some help here and when I try to help you, you get all excited and belligerent... Calm the hell down and listen instead of trying to talking around the fact that you don't know what the hell you're doing...