Codaxx
Well-Known Member
This is where I think teams go wrong in drafting.
Unless you KNOW you can develop potential, it's pretty meaningless. I look for talent.....skills that will translate as soon as possible.
Take the draft when Greg Oden was drafted over Kevin Durant. Durant no question was more talented. Oden was just.....BIG. But that size doesn't really mean much if you have no other talent. Oden had no post moves, no shot, not even great defense. He was just bigger than any other players. Hell even Shawn Bradley got drafted PURELY on size......
Hield is a ready made player. ALL he needs is stronger handles to get to the rim.
I dont think that is particularly accurate. Oden's career was just derailed by injuries. I think the calculus in basketball is just different. It is really a game of stars. Spurs are the exception, but historically you win titles behind stars. SPURS run started with drafting Duncan, one of the all-time greats. This all makes sense as basketball has the smallest amount of players of any team sport, because one good player is 20% of your starters. Collection of good players doesnt get you to a title, so NBA GMs are looking for the high ceiling guy that can be a top 5 NBA player. You get him and then its easy to build a team around him. Its the same reason that GMs reach for QBs in the draft in football. The real isssue for the NBA is that kids dont stay long enough to allow them to judge if that potential will ever turn into production.
Last edited: