3 titles in 11 years is a great dynasty now?
Ok.
According to my San Francisco Giants buddies, a dynasty is 2 outta 3.
3 titles in 11 years is a great dynasty now?
Ok.
thats nuts
whats the record?
bonds?
might be williams...he had 29 at age 41
3 titles in 11 years is a great dynasty now?
Ok.
Gotta be. Which proves that he's a roider.
Maybe the Rangers are just that good
Parcells:
"I regret leaving New England. Had we done things differently ... " Parcells told USA Today. "I had a good young team there. I hated to leave that team, because I knew what we could do.
"I was absolutely too headstrong. And he might have been a little headstrong, too. I think both Kraft and myself, retrospectively, would have done things a little differently."
The revelation that Parcells regrets leaving before one of the NFL's greatest dynasties took off
According to my San Francisco Giants buddies, a dynasty is 2 outta 3.
Maybe...
But these guys like Miller, and Lynn...I just don't see them duplicating their 1st halves.
Lynn faded badly last year, and Miller is still a rookie, who will be approaching a professional high in innings and will be doing the old "2nd time around the league"
Combine that with the fact that Roidier is not a .350 hitter, and the annual Beltran 2nd half swoon, and the Cards will be who I thought they were...a WC team.
One more in the next couple of years, and they would be...
Just like the Pats were A DECADE AGO.
3 titles in 11 years is a great dynasty now?
Ok.
1 title every three years is a dynasty
got it
makes up for his fucked up son
The definition of dynasty seems to be evolving.
3 titles in 4 years. That's a dynasty. Not sure why you used the 11 year time frame. According to your ilk the Pats have sucked from the moment the 2005 regular season started. Still makes them a dynasty.
makes up for his fucked up son
Are you talking about the kid with the disease that died? That's fucked up
MAVS DYNASTY!