Bowl Records 1998-2013 By Conference

[boxedlunch]

He's not the sharpest tool in the shed. :rollseyes:

Et tu? Nobody wants to be an adult here? I expect it from the clowns, but you?

Tell me, do you really think you can determine who's been the best conference from the limited data in this thread? Really? Make a case for me.

 

[boxedlunch]

So it this list compiled with current affiliation or affiliation at the time the games were played? All the conference jumping lately is why I ask because it would give different results...

The Big West should tip you off to this.

 

[KansasSooner]

The Big West should tip you off to this.

Don't really follow the smaller conferences so...anyway wouldn't it just be easier to answer the question? Oh well, I'll take it for it shows, the Big 12 has sucked in bowl games. Barely above .500 is a bad showing for a supposedly strong conference.

 

[fredmccallyRTR]

 

[geneh_33]

Et tu? Nobody wants to be an adult here? I expect it from the clowns, but you?

Tell me, do you really think you can determine who's been the best conference from the limited data in this thread? Really? Make a case for me.

Why don't you just can the whole argument already? There is no way you or anyone else can prove who the best conference is from a bunch of stats, whether in this thread or any other. A valid argument could be made for any of the major conferences. Just depends on what stats you want to cherry pick, that's all.

When you get right down to it, it is all just a matter of opinion and that's all it is.

 

[boxedlunch]

Why don't you just can the whole argument already? There is no way you or anyone else can prove who the best conference is from a bunch of stats, whether in this thread or any other. A valid argument could be made for any of the major conferences. Just depends on what stats you want to cherry pick, that's all.

When you get right down to it, it is all just a matter of opinion and that's all it is.

What argument? I dropped it a long time ago. The third grader picked it up, in case you missed it. Then you did. I thought you were above such things.

BTW, you agreed with me here. I'm not the one who said who was the best or worse conference, that was the third grader. I asked them to make that point and basically they refused.

 

[boxedlunch]

Don't really follow the smaller conferences so...anyway wouldn't it just be easier to answer the question? Oh well, I'll take it for it shows, the Big 12 has sucked in bowl games. Barely above .500 is a bad showing for a supposedly strong conference.

The Big West dropped football years ago.

 

[boxedlunch]

Number of teams that finished ranked by conference 98-13:

1. SEC 86
2. Big Ten 65
3. Big 12 64
4. ACC 52
5. PAC-12 49
6. Big East 34
7. MWC 19
8. WAC 15
9. CUSA 11
10. Independent 9
11. MAC 8
12. AAC 2

 

[geneh_33]

What argument? I dropped it a long time ago. The third grader picked it up, in case you missed it. Then you did. I thought you were above such things.

BTW, you agreed with me here. I'm not the one who said who was the best or worse conference, that was the third grader. I asked them to make that point and basically they refused.

C'mon, man, I had posted that crap about the ACC being the best conference tongue-in-cheek. Just because we won a couple of BCS games doesn't mean we have the best conference, surely everyone knows that. I posted that to help show that even a lame argument can be made to say the ACC is better than the SEC, which it isn't, not yet.

Anyway, all I said is that you aren't the smartest guy on here. I didn't say you were stupid or anything like that.

Do I know you from some other board? Your style seems familiar.

 

[boxedlunch]

C'mon, man, I had posted that crap about the ACC being the best conference tongue-in-cheek. Just because we won a couple of BCS games doesn't mean we have the best conference, surely everyone knows that. I posted that to help show that even a lame argument can be made to say the ACC is better than the SEC, which it isn't, not yet.

Anyway, all I said is that you aren't the smartest guy on here. I didn't say you were stupid or anything like that.

Do I know you from some other board? Your style seems familiar.

Oh yeah, your comment was very polite. Sorry I missed that.

You seemed to missed that you agree with me.

 

[boxedlunch]

Non-conference records against teams that finished ranked 98-13:

1. SEC (74-103-0)--0.41808
2. PAC-12 (56-116-0)--0.32558
3. Big Ten (51-109-0)--0.31875
4. Big 12 (40-92-0)--0.30303
5. Big East (28-78-0)--0.26415
6. ACC (47-135-0)--0.25824
7. Independent (22-144-0)--0.13253
8. AAC (1-7-0)--0.12500
9. MWC (12-98-0)--0.10909
10. CUSA (17-167-0)--0.09239
11. WAC (12-121-0)--0.09023
12. MAC (4-149-0)--0.02614
13. Big West (0-15-0)--0.00000
13. Sun Belt (0-116-0)--0.00000

 

[boxedlunch]

Non-conference record against AQ teams:

1. SEC (181-144-0)--0.55692
2. PAC-12 (148-135-0)--0.52297
3. Big 12 (144-139-0)--0.50883
4. Big Ten (166-179-0)--0.48116
5. ACC (180-208-0)--0.46392
6. Big East (132-158-0)--0.45517
7. Independent (137-265-0)--0.34080
8. MWC (89-174-0)--0.33840
9. AAC (6-14-0)--0.30000
10. WAC (63-225-0)--0.21875
11. CUSA (81-315-0)--0.20455
12. MAC (72-382-0)--0.15859
13. Big West (4-39-0)--0.09302
14. Sun Belt (19-258-0)--0.06859

 

[WhiteMamba]

thread is still going and the B1G is still the worst AQ conference...

 

[boxedlunch]

thread is still going and the B1G is still the worst AQ conference...

At first this was confusing, but then it dawned on me that to someone of low intelligence, it might appear I care what the Big Ten was ranked by people. However, my object was, has been, and still is that people draw conclusions based on very limited information. It would be like Vanderbilt fans claiming their program has been greater than Texas because they lead the all-time series. Making conclusions on limited information leads to incorrect conclusions. What's even more alarming is that people are unaware of how limited the information is that the conclusions were drawn on.

 

[Gator]

Non-conference record against AQ teams:

1. SEC (181-144-0)--0.55692
2. PAC-12 (148-135-0)--0.52297
3. Big 12 (144-139-0)--0.50883
4. Big Ten (166-179-0)--0.48116
5. ACC (180-208-0)--0.46392
6. Big East (132-158-0)--0.45517
7. Independent (137-265-0)--0.34080
8. MWC (89-174-0)--0.33840
9. AAC (6-14-0)--0.30000
10. WAC (63-225-0)--0.21875
11. CUSA (81-315-0)--0.20455
12. MAC (72-382-0)--0.15859
13. Big West (4-39-0)--0.09302
14. Sun Belt (19-258-0)--0.06859

You forgot something. Here is the same list sorted by Opponents records.
1 SEC (181-144-0)--0.55692---- (2505-1303-0)--0.65783
2 PAC-12 (148-135-0)--0.52297---- (2057-1225-0)--0.62675
3 ACC (180-208-0)--0.46392---- (2807-1685-0)--0.62489
4 Big 12 (144-139-0)--0.50883---- (2045-1236-0)--0.62329
5 Big Ten (166-179-0)--0.48116---- (2370-1599-0)--0.59713
6 Sun Belt (19-258-0)--0.06859---- (1917-1323-0)--0.59167
7 Big East (132-158-0)--0.45517---- (1939-1387-0)--0.58298
8 AAC (6-14-0)--0.30000---- (135-101-0)--0.57203
9 WAC (63-225-0)--0.21875---- (1872-1431-0)--0.56676
10 CUSA (81-315-0)--0.20455---- (2567-1981-0)--0.56442
11 Independent (137-265-0)--0.34080---- (2572-2012-0)--0.56108
12 MWC (89-174-0)--0.33840---- (1674-1350-0)--0.55357
13 MAC (72-382-0)--0.15859---- (2793-2398-0)--0.53805
14 Big West (4-39-0)--0.09302---- (244-220-0)--0.52586

 

[geneh_33]

thread is still going and the B1G is still the worst AQ conference...

 

[ellupo]

thread is still going and the B1G is still the worst AQ conference...

As long as I can still remember tOSU whooping Oregon in the Rose Bowl, that matters not.

 

[geneh_33]

As long as I can still remember tOSU whooping Oregon in the Rose Bowl, that matters not.

For some reason, that Clemson win in the Orange Bowl keeps sticking out in my mind.

 

[963BUSC]

Number of teams that finished ranked by conference 98-13:

1. SEC 86
2. Big Ten 65
3. Big 12 64
4. ACC 52
5. PAC-12 49
6. Big East 34
7. MWC 19
8. WAC 15
9. CUSA 11
10. Independent 9
11. MAC 8
12. AAC 2

Well of course this one is meaningless. Anyone can just throw stats out there that say nothing.

 

[boxedlunch]

Well of course this one is meaningless. Anyone can just throw stats out there that say nothing.

Someone actually gets the point.