With comments like I've seen here, no intelligent person would want to make 500 posts here.
The Big East was always dismissed as the worst BCS league....
Yet, they routinely smacked the anointed best SEC around like nobody else did.
Essentially, proving that conference homerism is a waste of time and a circular argument.
No conference has ever won a single bowl game.
So, looking at a small percentage of the games, no SOS measurement at all, no breakdown what-so-ever, it's "clear" to you?
You guys really aren't that deep, are you?
With comments like I've seen here, no intelligent person would want to make 500 posts here.
I assumed you listed all the bowl/bcs games in that era. Why only list a small percentage of them?
Yet you are still coming back for some reason.![]()
I did list all the bowls. Teams play one bowl game a year in a 11+ game season. That's a small percentage and certainly not enough to judge the overall.
So, looking at a small percentage of the games, no SOS measurement at all, no breakdown what-so-ever, it's "clear" to you?
You guys really aren't that deep, are you?
People use small sample sizes all the time to come to conclusions. Polls done on 1000, 10000 even 100000 people(and everywhere in between) are regularly used to determine the nations pulse on an issue. We are a nation of 350 million plus people. Talk about small sample sizes.
lBut, your topic was bowl recordsgood work on the list, tho. you had to see some big or acc slams coming from it. I expected the acc to be worse, honestly.
Is that right? I pointed out the flaws in that argument and they act like it's my problem. Shoot, if I add one more category that has the Big East up top, following that line of thought the Big East will be the best conference since 1998. We've already "proven" they are second best, I guess. I'm having a hard time following this line of reasoning.
Op destroying people in this thread.
Interesting, from my perspective the op is getting owned.