Bowl Records 1998-2013 By Conference

[boxedlunch]

By conference 1998-2013, on field:

1. Big West (3-0-0)--1.00000
2. Big East (46-29-0)--0.61333
3. SEC (80-53-0)--0.60150
4. MWC (35-27-0)--0.56452
5. Big 12 (61-60-0)--0.50413
6. PAC-12 (47-48-0)--0.49474
7. Sun Belt (12-13-0)--0.48000
8. ACC (54-61-0)--0.46957
9. CUSA (36-44-0)--0.45000
10. WAC (23-29-0)--0.44231
11. Big Ten (49-64-0)--0.43363
12. Independent (10-15-0)--0.40000
12. AAC (2-3-0)--0.40000
14. MAC (21-33-0)--0.38889

98-13, officially:

1. Big West (3-0-0)--1.00000
2. Big East (46-29-0)--0.61333
3. SEC (79-53-0)--0.59848
4. MWC (35-27-0)--0.56452
5. Big 12 (61-60-0)--0.50413
6. PAC-12 (46-47-0)--0.49462
7. Sun Belt (12-13-0)--0.48000
8. ACC (53-61-0)--0.46491
9. CUSA (36-44-0)--0.45000
10. WAC (23-29-0)--0.44231
11. Independent (10-15-0)--0.40000
11. AAC (2-3-0)--0.40000
13. Big Ten (42-64-0)--0.39623
14. MAC (21-33-0)--0.38889

BCS Bowls 98-13, on field:

1. AAC (1-0-0)--1.00000
2. MWC (3-1-0)--0.75000
3. WAC (2-1-0)--0.66667
4. SEC (17-10-0)--0.62963
5. PAC-12 (13-8-0)--0.61905
6. Big East (8-7-0)--0.53333
7. Big Ten (13-15-0)--0.46429
8. Big 12 (10-12-0)--0.45455
9. ACC (5-13-0)--0.27778
10. MAC (0-1-0)--0.00000
10. Independent (0-4-0)--0.00000

BCS Bowls 98-13, officially:

1. AAC (1-0-0)--1.00000
2. MWC (3-1-0)--0.75000
3. WAC (2-1-0)--0.66667
4. PAC-12 (12-7-0)--0.63158
5. SEC (17-10-0)--0.62963
6. Big East (8-7-0)--0.53333
7. Big 12 (10-12-0)--0.45455
8. Big Ten (11-15-0)--0.42308
9. ACC (5-13-0)--0.27778
10. MAC (0-1-0)--0.00000
10. Independent (0-4-0)--0.00000

Bowl Records vs BCS Ranked teams (98-13), on field:

1. AAC (1-0-0)--1.00000
1. Sun Belt (1-0-0)--1.00000
3. MWC (7-4-0)--0.63636
4. SEC (46-28-0)--0.62162
5. CUSA (6-4-0)--0.60000
6. Big East (9-10-0)--0.47368
7. PAC-12 (23-26-0)--0.46939
8. Big Ten (29-40-0)--0.42029
9. WAC (5-7-0)--0.41667
10. ACC (17-25-0)--0.40476
11. Big 12 (21-32-0)--0.39623
12. MAC (0-3-0)--0.00000
12. Independent (0-6-0)--0.00000

Bowl Records vs BCS Ranked teams (98-13), officially:

1. AAC (1-0-0)--1.00000
1. Sun Belt (1-0-0)--1.00000
3. MWC (7-4-0)--0.63636
4. SEC (45-28-0)--0.61644
5. CUSA (6-4-0)--0.60000
6. Big East (9-10-0)--0.47368
7. PAC-12 (22-25-0)--0.46809
8. WAC (5-7-0)--0.41667
9. Big 12 (21-32-0)--0.39623
10. ACC (16-25-0)--0.39024
11. Big Ten (24-40-0)--0.37500
12. MAC (0-3-0)--0.00000
12. Independent (0-6-0)--0.00000

 

[OnlyCrimson]

SEC SEC SEC

 

[TexasExes98]

SEC SEC SEC

Big West Big West Big West

 

[WhiteMamba]

lol @ the B1G

 

[OnlyCrimson]

It's safe to say that the Big 10 was the worst conference during the BCS era.

 

[boxedlunch]

It's safe to say that the Big 10 was the worst conference during the BCS era.

How so?

 

[Hornsstampede2.0]

The Big East was always dismissed as the worst BCS league....


Yet, they routinely smacked the anointed best SEC around like nobody else did.


Essentially, proving that conference homerism is a waste of time and a circular argument.


No conference has ever won a single bowl game.

 

[963BUSC]

Such a simple thing to understand how vacated games worked, yet you did when so many are either incapable. For that I salute you.

 

[OnlyCrimson]

How so?

Did you even look at post #1

 

[boxedlunch]

Did you even look at post #1

I did, I wrote it.

So, looking at a small percentage of the games, no SOS measurement at all, no breakdown what-so-ever, it's "clear" to you? Okay.

 

[OnlyCrimson]

I did, I wrote it.

So, looking at a small percentage of the games, no SOS measurement at all, no breakdown what-so-ever, it's "clear" to you? Okay.

Lol, I guess who did read it then. Here's my reason for stating that the Big 10 was the worst.

Out of the 6 Major Conferences (SEC, ACC, Big East, Big 12, Big 10 and the PAC)

Paragraph 1 - they finished 6th

Paragraph 2 - they finished 6th

Paragraph 3 - they finished 5th

Paragraph 4 - they finished 6th

Paragraph 5 - they finished 4th

Paragraph 6 - they finished 6th

That's an average of 5.5 place

---------------------------------------------11

SEC averaged 1.5 place finish

Big East averaged 2.0 place finish

PAC 12 averaged a 2.8 place finish

Big 12 averaged 4.0 place finish

ACC averaged 5.3 place finish

Big 10 averaged 5.5 place finish


That's why I said the Big 10 was the worst.

 

[boxedlunch]

Lol, I guess who did read it then. Here's my reason for stating that the Big 10 was the worst.

Out of the 6 Major Conferences (SEC, ACC, Big East, Big 12, Big 10 and the PAC)

Paragraph 1 - they finished 6th

Paragraph 2 - they finished 6th

Paragraph 3 - they finished 5th

Paragraph 4 - they finished 6th

Paragraph 5 - they finished 4th

Paragraph 6 - they finished 6th

That's an average of 5.5 place

---------------------------------------------11

SEC averaged 1.5 place finish

Big East averaged 2.0 place finish

PAC 12 averaged a 2.8 place finish

Big 12 averaged 4.0 place finish

ACC averaged 5.3 place finish

Big 10 averaged 5.5 place finish


That's why I said the Big 10 was the worst.

So, looking at a small percentage of the games, no SOS measurement at all, no breakdown what-so-ever, it's "clear" to you? Okay.

 

[WhiteMamba]

So, looking at a small percentage of the games, no SOS measurement at all, no breakdown what-so-ever, it's "clear" to you? Okay.

I think it was clear to everyone beforehand. Your list just justified it.

 

[boxedlunch]

I think it was clear to everyone beforehand. Your list just justified it.

So, looking at a small percentage of the games, no SOS measurement at all, no breakdown what-so-ever, it's "clear" to you?

You guys really aren't that deep, are you?

 

[OnlyCrimson]

So, looking at a small percentage of the games, no SOS measurement at all, no breakdown what-so-ever, it's "clear" to you? Okay.

When that "small percentage" is a compilation list of all bowl games played, broken down by wins, losses and wining percentage then yes I would call that a clear standard to look at. Bowl games have always been a way of measuring how good or bad conferences are as a whole and your outstanding list you put together is an excellent measuring stick.

 

[WhiteMamba]

So, looking at a small percentage of the games, no SOS measurement at all, no breakdown what-so-ever, it's "clear" to you?

You guys really aren't that deep, are you?

Well go ahead and pull up B1G vs the PAC in the regular season in the BCS era then. More of the same.

 

[OnlyCrimson]

So, looking at a small percentage of the games, no SOS measurement at all, no breakdown what-so-ever, it's "clear" to you?

You guys really aren't that deep, are you?

With comments like that I doubt you will make 500 post here.

 

[boxedlunch]

Well go ahead and pull up B1G vs the PAC in the regular season in the BCS era then. More of the same.

#1 head to head records tell little on their own.
#2 The PAC was far better than the Big Ten over that period.

Why you would think either would support your overall claim would be a mystery to me.

 

[boxedlunch]

With comments like that I doubt you will make 500 post here.

With comments like I've seen here, no intelligent person would want to make 500 posts here.

 

[WhiteMamba]

With comments like I've seen here, no intelligent person would want to make 500 posts here.