mad2mc
Well-Known Member
Its based upon us having everything that we could ever want coming back and the rest of the conference going through transition years.
The defense has to replace White and Benton but still PLENTY coming back defensively to be more than effective (if you believe in the 3-3-5) on that side of the ball.
Offense is loaded for bear, we don't need anything in that department.
Dana's 2nd year as the ST's coach should have that group finally playing at a high level.
Should be the most talented/well balanced team Dana has had and the league is in transition, no excuses, NONE!
I cant wait, we will either have a great year and move forward OR the wheels to move on from what will be proven a mediocre at best HC will be in high gear. Either way.... very exciting times ahead.
We have ALL the parts in place? So our OL & DL will be CCG caliber? Our LB core? We can plug and play our front 5 and front 3?
So you’re betting the farm on Dana all on next season and a league in transition. I’m not so sure the league is in a major transition. I say that the talent lost on OU brings them almost down to our level, but they still have the horses up front on both sides of the ball. You say if he doesn’t make the CCG, then we move on from a “mediocre” HC, but if he makes it to the CCG, his status elevates? Does he go to “slightly above” mediocre and his clock resets? He gets another 5 years to make a CCG? What happened to that guy who said coaches should be on a year to year contract and ushered out of here if he doesn’t make it to the NC in 3 years?