- Thread starter
- #1
jbuck
Active Member
air it out
I don’t mind the call if it set up a slightly shorter kick attempt.I was ready to tear into Taylor for that playcall on 3rd and 5 until I realized it forced GB to use their final TO. Not sure it was the right call but I see the logic behind it.
I don’t mind the call if it set up a slightly shorter kick attempt.
I was actually okay with that decision... I wasn't okay with the defense giving up a big pass to Devonte Adams the next play (which should have led to a winning GB field goal). But, I did understand that decision.I agree. It was definitely the call if they were in more makable range.
I thought it made no sense at that spot in the field until I realized an incompletion sets up either a 60 yd FG attempt or a 4th and 5 close to midfield with GB having a TO in their back pocket.
Yeah, he said he didn't even hit the 57 yarder very well and that is why it faded to the right. He knew when he kicked it that it might fade. That's pretty ridiculous given how high up on the post it hit from 57.Another thing about the missed FGs...
How strong is McPherson's leg? The 57 yarder hit halfway up the upright and the 49 yarder was over the goalpost. He has the range to make it from 70 yards.
I'm not sure what the Colts were doing in the 2nd half on defense, but rushing just 4 and getting almost zero pressure 99% of the time was a poor, poor approach.unfortunate that the ravens will pull ahead in the lead for the division.
but we showed about where we are against a playoff team.
still a lot of season left.