vancelot23
Active Member
I don't think you understand the tag. One of its main advantages is to allow you to keep a (relatively) valuable player for one additional year while you
1) determine if he is worth signing long term (assuming he hasn't consistently shown he's a keeper), or
2) probably as is our case, try to find a replacement without losing that (relatively) valuable player, being left with garbage, and making your team even worse.
Who gives a crap if he makes more money than he deserves for one year. This is about looking out for the interests of the Bengals not only long term, but also short term.
There is no reason not to lock Nugent up long term. None.
Rep since we actually agree on something.