Redskins77
Member
Just my opinion, but Allen was taking plays off and his production curtailed after signing that contract extension.I am not sure about that but certainly it is possible
Just my opinion, but Allen was taking plays off and his production curtailed after signing that contract extension.I am not sure about that but certainly it is possible
I will say this, he consistancy in stopping the run was a valuable asset.Just my opinion, but Allen was taking plays off and his production curtailed after signing that contract extension.
Maybe I am wrong, I’d have to check some stats, but it always seemed to me that the combo of Allen and Payne underachieved especially the last couple seasons. Perhaps it was due to shitty linebackers not making plays but I just feel they should have been more dominant.I will say this, he consistancy in stopping the run was a valuable asset.
From my understanding, there is not a definitive answer to your question.Hold up, is Lattimore playing Sunday? I thought he was hurt?
Surprising , what is your reasoning , and yes I agree with youNope!
How about a second for Parsons and a 3rd for Metcalf?The deal breaker is Metcalf and beyond that, I would only part with a second for Parsons!
What does history say about that ?How about a second for Parsons and a 3rd for Metcalf?
How's this for an answer... If I'm AP I'd finalize that deal faster than I could blink, however Dallas would never take a 2nd for DK, Metcalf might get traded for a third, but it would have to be a high third, in the 1-12 range.How about a second for Parsons and a 3rd for Metcalf?