- Thread starter
- #21
you do know thats based on more than just football right?I could not care less how QBs do in the NFL. I'm talking college, where the "Conference of Champions" has one (vacated) national championship since 1991.
yikes, two top 100 QB's from the same class. what chased them off?
Clemson and 13 little indians not to mention the fact your pseudo 14 member conference doesn't even play each other.
They got the shits of sitting on the bench while Petersen kept stocking the cupboard.yikes, two top 100 QB's from the same class. what chased them off?
you do know thats based on more than just football right?
its for all sports.
Still doesn't make much sense. Washington only signed a lower end four star in the 2019 class and these guys only had a 3 3star in the class ahead of them (outside of 5 star jr Eason). Seems like the 2018 class would have battled it out for the starting spot here in a year or two.They got the shits of sitting on the bench while Petersen kept stocking the cupboard.
Dylan Morris ... the QB they just signed this last class is the #4 Pro style QB in the country. Then they have Eason and Haener ahead of them and instead of slowing down on recruiting QB's Petersen goes and recruits Ethan Garber and the Huard kid. They said 'fvck this' and entered the portal. I don't blame them one damn bit. There was no need to keep signing QB's like they were ready to go on the extinction list.Still doesn't make much sense. Washington only signed a lower end four star in the 2019 class and these guys only had a 3 3star in the class ahead of them (outside of 5 star jr Eason). Seems like the 2018 class would have battled it out for the starting spot here in a year or two.
One other thing I'd like to add .. UW's QB development is non existent. Petersen's OC's at Washington have sucked balls. This recent one has never been an OC until Petersen gave him the job last year. Petersen keeps hiring Boise St retreads instead of going out and hiring a real OC. Browning couldn't throw the long ball to save his life and after the end of last season he got help from someone in California and he was killing it at the combine in regards to the long ball. Four years at Washington and the coaching staff did zilch to improve his throwing arm.Still doesn't make much sense. Washington only signed a lower end four star in the 2019 class and these guys only had a 3 3star in the class ahead of them (outside of 5 star jr Eason). Seems like the 2018 class would have battled it out for the starting spot here in a year or two.
Top 4 sports in viewership is:Fair enough, let's look at all major sports.
As already established, in football, since 1990, teams in the Pac 12 have 2 national championships. UW shared one in 1991, USC has one in 2004 (vacated)). The SEC has 13, ACC schools have 6, and the BIG 10 has 5. In basketball, since 1990, teams from the Pac 12 have won 2 titles (UCLA in 95, Arizona in 97). Teams from the ACC have 12, the SEC has 6, and the BIG 10 has 4. In baseball, the Pac 12 has 6. The SEC has 11. The ACC has 6. In hockey, the Pac 12 has 0. The ACC has 5 and the Big 10 has 7. Soccer is something the Pac 12 is good at. They have 5 championships since 1990 (Stanford went on a three year winning streak recently). Unfortunately, the ACC has 11. The Big 10 has 6. In golf, you've actually got 7 total. You beat the ACC there, but the SEC and Big 12 both beat you by one (Okie State are apparently golfing monsters). The Pac 12 doesn't have the most championships in any of these sports, and loses most really badly, the six most popular in American. Tennis is the first sport the Pac 12 wins at (Stanford and USC have a lot of championships since its a sport for rich white kids), which is the seventh in ratings.
The Pac 12 is good at a lot of stupid sports that very few teams even do, have no fans or spectators, and literally no one cares about. For example, USC traditionally dominates at men's water polo, as well as beach volleyball. There are less than 20 men's water polo teams in the NCAA (and only 4 division 1 teams), and 14 of the teams are in the state of California. Not a real sport, let alone a legitimate national championship. Conference of champions indeed.
Fair enough, let's look at all major sports.
So what you are saying is the PAC12 has 12 little Indians.Clemson and 13 little indians not to mention the fact your pseudo 14 member conference doesn't even play each other.
Like I said in another thread, “if you can’t be good in the sports that matter, you might as well be good in the sports that don’t”in 2017 the Pac went over 500
at that time Big 10 was second with 306 and SEC third with 220
Since you're always pimping up the 12 Pac conference way not get that logo tattooed on your forehead?
stfu. You're the same poster who defended the SEC and ACC's 8 game conference schedule.Like I said in another thread, “if you can’t be good in the sports that matter, you might as well be good in the sports that don’t”
I said it can be ideal if done properly but neither one of them are doing it properly.stfu. You're the same poster who defended the SEC and ACC's 8 game conference schedule.