- Thread starter
- #1
Brees#1
Well-Known Member
This seems to be the thing about fantasy football that is so confusing. I'm beginning to realize that in order for me to understand football matchups I may have to pay for some kind of membership.
When the rams and saints played, the announcers were talking about the rams playing zone against one side of the field and man on the other. When stuff like this happens, it becomes confusing. Do players really succeed any better vs a man or zone defense? If a team plays two defenses then chances are the player has a chance to succeed because he's facing two styles.
Or how about what happened yesterday. the bengals allow Brees, Mayfield, Fitzpatrick, Cam, and Ryan to exploit them, but when they play LAC they show up defensively against Rivers. Is there something there about that matchup I don't know about. Do the chargers have a terrible oline or something? Is it the stadium?
This stuff right here becomes hard to conceptualize and figure out without paying for it.
I have more in this thread.
When the rams and saints played, the announcers were talking about the rams playing zone against one side of the field and man on the other. When stuff like this happens, it becomes confusing. Do players really succeed any better vs a man or zone defense? If a team plays two defenses then chances are the player has a chance to succeed because he's facing two styles.
Or how about what happened yesterday. the bengals allow Brees, Mayfield, Fitzpatrick, Cam, and Ryan to exploit them, but when they play LAC they show up defensively against Rivers. Is there something there about that matchup I don't know about. Do the chargers have a terrible oline or something? Is it the stadium?
This stuff right here becomes hard to conceptualize and figure out without paying for it.
I have more in this thread.