MHSL82
Well-Known Member
Agreed. The notion that blowing .08 = drunk driving is absolutely ridiculous. A guy who blows .08 isn't anymore dangerous than a college student who's been awake for 16 straight hours studying for a test, or an old lady that can barely see and doesn't know how to use her signals.
Drunk drivers in general have been so villianized that people don't even pay attention to context or what's behind it.
Yes, that's why I refuse become a part of their club. I just don't have thick enough skin.
The 'fact' (taking your word for this) that a guy who blows an .08 isn't more dangerous than a college student who's been awake for long hours (I think 16 is a little low, I've been up for 24+ before I think I'd be affected as much as 0.08 and I'm a lightweight - but that's besides the point), doesn't excuse the drinking. It just makes the amount of vitriol against the drunk driver overstated.
I don't think they're any more dangerous, but they are more blameworthy of it. If they are swerving or hit somebody, I don't care if it could very well have just been a tired student. (The tired student should get something short of reckless driving and/or the fault in the accident report) I'm not basing my argument upon 0.08 or 0.16 or any number. You're responsible for whatever level you are at and the state has determined that 0.08 is the limit. I'm all for raising the limit if there can be some support for it. But as space said, who would stand up for the 8 percenters?