OUGuy1999
BOOMER..SOONERS!!!
So no answer to my question... just an insult. Got it.
very telling.
I didnt insult you, if you took it that way then maybe you need to change your rags. You obviously have no clue how bets or legal binding contracts work, so there is nothing more to say since you cannot provide anything but proof of a conversation about a bet but no agreement to the bet. Since you want to accuse someone of not holding their end of the bet then it is your job to provide the evidence of the agreement (which you have not). It is no one else job but yours to provide the evidence as you are the accuser. Everyone here has seen what i posted and agrees that you did not have a valid agreement between you and AG, which is why no one is on your side. More than 50 people have seen the information i provided and seem to have all agreed that your bet was not agreed by the second party, therefor the bet was never placed neither verbally or legally, therefor you no longer can request payment for this bet unless you can provide further proof of the agreement taking place.
Dont bother replying to me unless it is proof of the agreement as i have nothing more to say to you. I dont like wasting my time on imbeciles who have no understanding of how the real world works. Have a bright and shiny day.