AlaskaGuy: Bet Welcher

[Wild Turkey]

You didn’t deny it which means you suck Handi’s dick.

Silence is acceptance...aren’t you paying attention?

 

[7Samurai13]

Silence is acceptance...aren’t you paying attention?

Yes, he accepts Handi’s dick, early and often.

 

[Wild Turkey]

Yes, he accepts Handi’s dick, early and often.

Now that is settled can we get back to the whelching?

 

[OUGuy1999]

I have zero dog in this fight, just read through 17 pages to see if anything comes about. As much as I dislike AG for his antics, the information so far provided has not proved anything in favor of OP. Here is the bet that has been provided to us by a so called "snitch".

LINK

I took the time myself since no one else will and provided the exact conversation. If anyone else can provide any other information as to when the initial bet was accepted, then OP will have a valid argument.

 

[dbldwn711]

Your silence was acceptance, remember?

You said it can’t.

First of all, in contracts silence can be acceptance when the offeree starts acting in a manner to suggest that the offer has been accepted. Look it up.

Second, there was NOT silence here. AG followed up handis post with a question. He asked “you want OSU plus points?” That’s NOT silence. There was other conduct AFTER that that further shows that he “accepted”. Look it up. Also, he clearly didn’t have a problem with 2-1 handi was offering

Third, even if there wasn’t an agreement (and there clearly was) there is a principle called detrimental reliance. Detrimental reliance is a term commonly used to force another to perform their obligations under a contract, using the theory of promissory estoppel. Promissory estoppel may apply when the following elements are proven: A promise was made. Relying on the promise was reasonable or foreseeable. When AG asked his question he didn’t say “no... I’m not doing that”. He was merely RESTATING what was AGREED UPON. He made no effort to say that the points were unacceptable. Therefore, it was reasonable to assume that he accepted them.

You clearly aren’t good at this. You should stick with your wife beating lying bet welching friend.

 

[7Samurai13]

You said it can’t.

First of all, in contracts silence can be acceptance when the offeree starts acting in a manner to suggest that the offer has been accepted. Look it up.

Second, there was NOT silence here. AG followed up handis post with a question. He asked “you want OSU plus points?” That’s NOT silence. There was other conduct AFTER that that further shows that he “accepted”. Look it up. Also, he clearly didn’t have a problem with 2-1 handi was offering

Third, even if there wasn’t an agreement (and there clearly was) there is a principle called detrimental reliance. Detrimental reliance is a term commonly used to force another to perform their obligations under a contract, using the theory of promissory estoppel. Promissory estoppel may apply when the following elements are proven: A promise was made. Relying on the promise was reasonable or foreseeable. When AG asked his question he didn’t say “no... I’m not doing that”. He was merely RESTATING what was AGREED UPON. He made no effort to say that the points were unacceptable. Therefore, it was reasonable to assume that he accepted them.

You clearly aren’t good at this. You should stick with your wife beating lying bet welching friend.

Again, Handi never accepted the bet. He changed the offer and AG never accepted the new terms.

 

[dbldwn711]

I have zero dog in this fight, just read through 17 pages to see if anything comes about. As much as I dislike AG for his antics, the information so far provided has not proved anything in favor of OP. Here is the bet that has been provided to us by a so called "snitch".

LINK

I took the time myself since no one else will and provided the exact conversation. If anyone else can provide any other information as to when the initial bet was accepted, then OP will have a valid argument.

Your “link” establishes an enforceable bet.

 

[dbldwn711]

Again, Handi never accepted the bet. He changed the offer and AG never accepted the new terms.

I can only teach you... I can’t learn it for you.

 

[7Samurai13]

I can only teach you... I can’t learn it for you.

Well you can’t really teach it when Handi is balls deep down your throat.

 

[handicappers]

Again, Handi never accepted the bet. He changed the offer and AG never accepted the new terms.

I made the bet. He accepted. Offered his vCash. Said Washington would destroy OSU. 3.5 points is way less than “destroy”

 

[Dolemite censored]

You said it can’t.

First of all, in contracts silence can be acceptance when the offeree starts acting in a manner to suggest that the offer has been accepted. Look it up.

Second, there was NOT silence here. AG followed up handis post with a question. He asked “you want OSU plus points?” That’s NOT silence. There was other conduct AFTER that that further shows that he “accepted”. Look it up. Also, he clearly didn’t have a problem with 2-1 handi was offering

Third, even if there wasn’t an agreement (and there clearly was) there is a principle called detrimental reliance. Detrimental reliance is a term commonly used to force another to perform their obligations under a contract, using the theory of promissory estoppel. Promissory estoppel may apply when the following elements are proven: A promise was made. Relying on the promise was reasonable or foreseeable. When AG asked his question he didn’t say “no... I’m not doing that”. He was merely RESTATING what was AGREED UPON. He made no effort to say that the points were unacceptable. Therefore, it was reasonable to assume that he accepted them.

You clearly aren’t good at this. You should stick with your wife beating lying bet welching friend.

The bar exams are next week. You look prepared.

 

[7Samurai13]

I made the bet. He accepted. Offered his vCash. Said Washington would destroy OSU. 3.5 points is way less than “destroy”

And he never agreed to 3.5 points. It wasn’t a completed deal.

 

[handicappers]

And he never agreed to 3.5 points. It wasn’t a completed deal.

Sure it was. He even repeated “so you get 3.5 points? “

 

[OUGuy1999]

Your “link” establishes an enforceable bet.

NO

Handi requests bet
AG states he would bet his vcash
Handi gives bet odds
AG requests agreement of odds and team
Handi never replies
Tidegirl accepts bet under same odds and team
Handi never accepts agreement with odds
Neither AG or Handi ever make a full agreement of bet

 

[Gatorchip]

So wait...this is about vcash?


bwahahahahaha

Doesn't it reset to 1 or 2k when you get to zero?

Once he pays up, he will end up with even more vcash than what he has currently. But still, he is desperate to hold on to what he has left.

 

[mcnabb7542]

You said it can’t.

First of all, in contracts silence can be acceptance when the offeree starts acting in a manner to suggest that the offer has been accepted. Look it up.

Second, there was NOT silence here. AG followed up handis post with a question. He asked “you want OSU plus points?” That’s NOT silence. There was other conduct AFTER that that further shows that he “accepted”. Look it up. Also, he clearly didn’t have a problem with 2-1 handi was offering

Third, even if there wasn’t an agreement (and there clearly was) there is a principle called detrimental reliance. Detrimental reliance is a term commonly used to force another to perform their obligations under a contract, using the theory of promissory estoppel. Promissory estoppel may apply when the following elements are proven: A promise was made. Relying on the promise was reasonable or foreseeable. When AG asked his question he didn’t say “no... I’m not doing that”. He was merely RESTATING what was AGREED UPON. He made no effort to say that the points were unacceptable. Therefore, it was reasonable to assume that he accepted them.

You clearly aren’t good at this. You should stick with your wife beating lying bet welching friend.

too many words for this crowd

 

[Gatorchip]

NO

Handi requests bet
AG states he would bet his vcash
Handi gives bet odds
AG requests agreement of odds and team
Handi never replies
Tidegirl accepts bet under same odds and team
Handi never accepts agreement with odds
Neither AG or Handi ever make a full agreement of bet

I agree.

So which person should be banned?

I say Tidegirl. Bama sucks.

 

[7Samurai13]

I agree.

So which person should be banned?

I say Tidegirl. Bama sucks.

Why not Tidegirl, AG, and Handi?

 

[dbldwn711]

NO

Handi requests bet
AG states he would bet his vcash
Handi gives bet odds
AG requests agreement of odds and team
Handi never replies
Tidegirl accepts bet under same odds and team
Handi never accepts agreement with odds
Neither AG or Handi ever make a full agreement of bet

Wrong. He took BOTH bets.

Did he ever pay tidegirl or did he Welch on that bet too?

 

[dbldwn711]

Sure it was. He even repeated “so you get 3.5 points? “

He certainly didn’t say “no”!!