AlaskaGuy: Bet Welcher

[B_dub]

I agree.

So which person should be banned?

I say Tidegirl. Bama sucks.

 

[dbldwn711]

Well you can’t really teach it when Handi is balls deep down your throat.

You can’t learn it while allowing AG to go ATM on you.

 

[OUGuy1999]

Wrong. He took BOTH bets.

Did he ever pay tidegirl or did he Welch on that bet too?

Post where both AG and Handi agree to the terms of the initial bet. I posted where tidegirl accepted with AG, but no where does it show AG and Handi agree to the terms. Until you can provide that, there is no proof of the agreement happening.

 

[7Samurai13]

You can’t learn it while allowing AG to go ATM on you.

Sorry, unlike you, I don’t do guys.

 

[handicappers]

Wait. So I make AG meltdown and snitch, another half dozen go full derp and I won’t be gettin those fat stacks?

what a rip off.

 

[handicappers]

Lol at Sparty turning this into his sexual fantasies.

 

[dbldwn711]

Sorry, unlike you, I don’t do guys.

Haha. My post was guys doing YOU!! Ok... so you’re a bottom. Your silence is accepted.

 

[7Samurai13]

Wait. So I make AG meltdown and snitch, another half dozen go full derp and I won’t be gettin those fat stacks?

what a rip off.

But you do get @dbldwn711 to suck you off as a consolation prize.

 

[7Samurai13]

Haha. My post was guys doing YOU!! Ok... so you’re a bottom. Your silence is accepted.

Yeah I don’t do that either. I’m not so up on the lingo of gay culture like you are.

 

[dbldwn711]

Post where both AG and Handi agree to the terms of the initial bet. I posted where tidegirl accepted with AG, but no where does it show AG and Handi agree to the terms. Until you can provide that, there is no proof of the agreement happening.

First of all you show me where AG said “no” to the new terms? I’ll wait...

Second, by not saying “no” couples with his CONDUCT you have an enforceable agreement.

 

[dbldwn711]

Yeah I don’t do that either. I’m not so up on the lingo of gay culture like you are.

Hahaha “ATM” is not “gay lingo” and I’m certain you were the one who introduced gay sex acts to the discussion so I’d say you are “up on it”.

 

[handicappers]

First of all you show me where AG said “no” to the new terms? I’ll wait...

Second, by not saying “no” couples with his CONDUCT you have an enforceable agreement.

that sounds scholarly. And by law, the truth.

 

[7Samurai13]

First of all you show me where AG said “no” to the new terms? I’ll wait...

Second, by not saying “no” couples with his CONDUCT you have an enforceable agreement.

What conduct? They never discuss it again. If you are buying a car, you tell them you will buy the car for $50k and they say okay, you can pay us $250k, you get up and walk out, doesn’t mean you bought the car.

 

[7Samurai13]

Hahaha “ATM” is not “gay lingo” and I’m certain you were the one who introduced gay sex acts to the discussion so I’d say you are “up on it”.

Tops and bottoms is gay lingo.

 

[handicappers]

Hahaha “ATM” is not “gay lingo” and I’m certain you were the one who introduced gay sex acts to the discussion so I’d say you are “up on it”.

Boom

snitches welshers and homos. The underbelly of the hoop

 

[handicappers]

What conduct? They never discuss it again. If you are buying a car, you tell them you will buy the car for $50k and they say okay, you can pay us $250k, you get up and walk out, doesn’t mean you bought the car.

I gave him 2-1 odds and took points, he replied “so you get points?”

he knew it was a bet

 

[OUGuy1999]

First of all you show me where AG said “no” to the new terms? I’ll wait...

Second, by not saying “no” couples with his CONDUCT you have an enforceable agreement.

Absolutely not, your confusing a question with a statement. Go back and look, when Handi presented the odds and the team for the bet "Ok, ill give you 2 - 1 odds, OSU +3.5", AG presented a question "You want OSU plus points?". This is not an acceptance of an agreement with terms, this is a formal question....hints why there is a "?" and not a ".". Legally, this would not be bound as a contract by law. Therefore it cannot be considered an agreement of terms. Take it to court and see who loses.

 

[7Samurai13]

I gave him 2-1 odds and took points, he replied “so you get points?”

he knew it was a bet

Did he ever say ok to those terms?

 

[handicappers]

Did he ever say ok to those terms?

He said ok to me calling him out on Washington annihilating OSU. He was obviously confident as he took the bet.

 

[7Samurai13]

He said ok to me calling him out on Washington annihilating OSU. He was obviously confident as he took the bet.

You never even confirmed that you get points. I never saw something that agreed to the terms that you listed. Please show us if we are missing anything. I don’t even like AG and I don’t agree with your BS narrative.