So DAD,
You go on… and on… and on… about the terrible/horrible coaching of Dana. You have seen Dana coach his boys up. You just admitted you saw an improved offense his first year. That offense also improved his second year.
But, I agree with you… results matter.
Now, I have shown you that even a hall of fame coach could not get results when he was forced to play inexperienced kids… to include his QB. Unlike Dana, his 1990 team couldn't even win a game against a team with a winning record.
However, you are convinced Dana cannot coach … despite what you've seen him accomplish… winning a BCS bowl. You are certain he cannot coach because of the drop off the last two years… in results… with young… inexperienced players. Yet we have all witnessed the same drop off with our hall of fame coach.
Can you explain why? Cause you look like a hypocrite.
No my friend, YOU are the hypocrite. When I talk of past glory at WVU, you say the past doesn't matter, yet now, you have cherry picked one year to use as an example. Like you said, Nehlen is a hall of famer, therefore he deserved some patience. Until the Texas game in 2012, I thought Holgorsen was an OK coach, not great, not horrible. Watching the wheels fall off the rest of that season, and the disaster that this past season was convinced me he is NOT a good coach, and may never be. The more of his recruits he brings in, the worse the team looks.