Brightboat
Well-Known Member
True. He rescued James that year in the finals but didn’t he force a trade out of there?Not the Cavs
True. He rescued James that year in the finals but didn’t he force a trade out of there?Not the Cavs
Out of bounds? I can't really give you a logical response until your drunk as gives me a time frame for this occurrence.Since no foul was called against Dallas on the Kidd challenge, why was play stopped and why did Minny have the ball prior to his challenge?
I had assumed all if this discussion was on the Wolves challenging who it went out on, and the review showing an Irving foul, which could not be included. Is it something else?The out of bounds rule is beyond stupid and I don’t get why they have yet to change it but yeah that’s what happened on the first review that Dallas challenged
Nice to be on the same page with at least 1 wolves fan
It does seem odd though that they review in an effort to get the call right, they don’t get the call right because they can’t review the entire playIn thay case a foul was called, so it was reviewable and they found a different foul. Which is the rule you highlighted. The fact that A foul was called makes it reviewable. If no foul had been called it would not have been reviewable.
On that last play no foul was called, all they could review was who touched the ball last, not if there was a foul.
Yeah, it is terrible rule, but it is the rule.It does seem odd though that they review in an effort to get the call right, they don’t get the call right because they can’t review the entire play
Nope the argument is about the first challenge. On the challenge you are talking about, I think we all agree it is a shit rule that should be changedI had assumed all if this discussion was on the Wolves challenging who it went out on, and the review showing an Irving foul, which could not be included. Is it something else?
In thay case a foul was called, so it was reviewable and they found a different foul. Which is the rule you highlighted. The fact that A foul was called makes it reviewable. If no foul had been called it would not have been reviewable.
On that last play no foul was called, all they could review was who touched the ball last, not if there was a foul.
Not a good recipe
Well then I will stay out of it. I was joining the argument on the wrong play.Nope the argument is about the first challenge. On the challenge you are talking about, I think we all agree it is a shit rule that should be changed
Rescued. You don’t watch much basketballTrue. He rescued James that year in the finals but didn’t he force a trade out of there?
Yeah, it is terrible rule, but it is the rule.
Yep Minny was in the bonus too so that’s 2 fts for McDaniels to give them a 3 or 4 pt leadWell then I will stay out of it. I was joining the argument on the wrong play.
That rule hurt
Made the huge game 7 winning shotRescued. You don’t watch much basketball
Draymond hates this dude with a passion.Lmao
Green is the most over-rated, selfish player in the league He has cost the warriors so many games with his bullshitDraymond hates this dude with a passion.
They‘ve caught whatever poor shooting virus Nuggets had in round 2 specifically MPJ.