This violates the Kovy clause, as does Philly with the Talbot deal he signed last year. I guess the good news is that lou has some really good cases to be given the lost 1st round pick back.
Talbot earns $9 million over a five year contract. Parisuter earns more than that in the goddamn SIGNING BONUS, don't even try to compare the two. I guarantee you that Philadelphia wasn't trying to gain some crazy type of competitive advantage by paying Talbot more than half his cap hit in the last years of the contract, which ends when he is 33, not 44, unlike the Kovalchuk contract. It was clear cap circumvention in that case. It's not here.
I understand you are pissed about the loss of the pick; I would be too, but the Flyers didn't get penalized because they screwed up by less than half of a percent of the cap on a player who will barring injury or catastrophe, but NOT barring old age, play out the entire contract.
True, the Pronger deal is a far better example of how Philly circumvented the cap.
i think the way they are justifying it is with the first 2 year parise is getting 10 mil in bonus and only getting 2 mil as a salary allowing the final 2 years to be for 1 mil
straight bullshit but there will always be a way to get around the rules
might not happen right away but give the gms time and they will figure out a way
That was my interpretation of the contract. HEY GUYS, IT'S OKAY WE ONLY GAVE HIM TEN SIGNING BONUSES WORTH NINE PERCENT OF THE CONTRACT EACH, IT'S NOT OVER THE TEN PERCENT LIMIT.
Zach left for personal reasons....what could be more personal than money?
If winning is important which it seems it is. Why not man up and convice suter to come here and u both play for a team two wins from the cup. Shit he makes it seem like nj to minnesota is a world away! Nowr he gets to play his prime years while prospects come up. If he wins the cup in minnesota i will be amazed