Well this opinion doesnt surprise me. & I get how people not paying attention wouldnt know his importance. And He may not make it in, not because he isnt deserving, but how people view football nowadays. People want to be able to point at a # & say this is why. People are either more lazy or more dumb when voting.
Ed Reed. Got plenty of turnovers & people point to that, but realistically he was so much more. & in that so much more is why he is so deserving to be in the HOF. Not because they could point at some # & say this is why.
I think there are interior D-Lineman that should very least be considered for HOF, but if they dont have some sack # to point at. They wont be.
So I agree with you on the fact he may not get in or at least not get in before some of these others, but the question was asked to me. Who should? He is more than worthy of getting in before some of these others.
Uh... I just listed some names that from me watching football, were a bit more impactful than Woodson was. Not saying Woodson was undeserving or a less worthy player..... but I remember saying to myself: "Oh boy, gotta find a way to stop Willis/Allen/Freeney, etc." and don't remember saying, "OH NO, it's Darren Woodson!" Like ya, you had to for sure take him into account, I just don't think he was that large of an impact.