- Thread starter
- #441
tlance
Kyrie Hater
If that is your view I don't think it's out of line at all (favoring the players over owners). But also not crazy to think owners should have as much right to get out of a bad deal as there is to have no recourse.
Except that the owner signed the contract. Agreeing to the deal.
If owners don't have to live up to their end, then players should also be able to void their contract and become a FA whenever they want if they are payed under market value.
But they can't do that.
I don't have a problem with owners making money. I do have a problem with how badly the deck is stacked against players in terms of contracts in the NFL.