obxyankeefan
Well-Known Member
Dude was prob offsides but no clue how they were able to overturn it. Either way you can't lose your composure like the preds did
I think they lost it more on the Crosby no call.
Dude was prob offsides but no clue how they were able to overturn it. Either way you can't lose your composure like the preds did
He definitely got all of itI'm okay with that period.
Also, Malkin's goal had some serious heat on it. Rinne reacted immediately. The puck just beat his glove to the spot. Incredible.
Totally different game if that Predators goal does not get overturned. I don't watch Hockey enough to say if it was a good or bad reversal but based on what NBC showed, I don't think they had clear enough evidence to overturn it.
I think they lost it more on the Crosby no call.
Bad rule that was close enough that it could have been called either way.
Good on-call, no issue with the Crosby check.
But shouldn't they have stuck with the original call in that case? Something similar to how the NFL do it. On close calls that are not clear even after replay then you just stick with the call made on the field (or in this case the ice) ?
My daughter laughed her head off at that...she was like, "its just an elbow!"Good on-call, no issue with the Crosby check.
If they had an angle which showed his skate off the ice before the puck crossed the line, that's all they needed. And we don't get to see every shot they have.
Too soon?
When did you start watching?Nashville commits the stupidest fucking penalty I have ever seen in a Finals
Too soon?
Even though it helped my team out here, it is a shitty rule. If the NHL keeps it they need to at least put a time limit on it. EG..If you are in the offensive zone for more then 10 seconds before scoring, the opposing team can not replay the offsides.
Almost enough to make you long for octopus or at least nice sized squidThat is disgusting. At the very least the catfish could have been somewhat intact.