cerealboi
Well-Known Member
What an individual is known to have done in the past while a member of a particular gang is irrelevant.
The gang culture always dictates that any particular member is capable of homicide. Doesn't mean they'll do it necessarily, but they will if circumstances dictate...as long as they're still involved with that culture.
While you're busy asking why the tiger ate the cute little baby rabbit...People with sense already know the answer...
BECAUSE HE'S A FUCKING TIGER...THAT'S WHY!!!
Another bad analogy. A better one would be to ask why your dog, whom you fed Alpo to every day who slept inside, ate the rabbit, even though you had trained it not to chase or eat rodents and gave it plenty of other things to do with it's free time.
Do you think that if I took 5 gang members from a small town gang, that they would all be equally likely to commit murder? If so do you have any proof of that?
As Ox said yesterday - we're all probably capable of homicide if the situation dictates. You need to shoot someone to save your family's life, do you do it? Probably more likely than if you were just mad at someone.
Why you choose to ignore specific circumstances and just hump the label is beyond me. As I said yesterday, would I be more surprised if choir boy Tebow was charged with murder than gangster Hernandez. Yes. Am I still surprised with Hernandez, yup.