- Thread starter
- #1
PhilSimms11
Well-Known Member
They're re-airing this game on NBCSN. That takes me back. Pissed me off when Nebraska didn't get that 2-point conversion to take the lead late in the game. Keep in mind, there was no OT in college back then. Nebraska scored to make it 31-30 and Tom Osbourne elected to go for the win instead of the tie. It's my understanding if the game ended in a tie Nebraska would've been crowned National Champions, but Dr Tom said screw that. Much respect. The Cornhuskers were snake bitten when it came to the National Championship in those days. They'd come so close and come up short. They ended up winning 3 titles in the final 4 years of Osbourne's tenure. He was a bad ass coach.
Miami ended up champions because of a slew of fucked up bowl game results. People felt (3)Auburn got screwed over. Miami was moved up 4 spots to #1 and Auburn stayed at #3. Had the Orange Bowl ended in a tie could Auburn have been bumped up to #1?
Orange: (5)Miami 31, (1)Nebraska 30.
Cotton: (7)Georgia 10, (2)Texas 9.
Sugar: (3)Auburn 9, (8)Michigan 7.
Rose: UCLA 45, (4)Illinois 9.
Oh, if we only had an 8-team playoff back then.
(1)Nebraska (12-0) vs (8)Michigan (9-2)
(4)Illinois (10-1) vs (5)Miami (10-1)
(2)Texas (11-0) vs (7)Georgia (9-1-1)
(3)Auburn (10-1) vs (6)SMU (10-1)
Miami ended up champions because of a slew of fucked up bowl game results. People felt (3)Auburn got screwed over. Miami was moved up 4 spots to #1 and Auburn stayed at #3. Had the Orange Bowl ended in a tie could Auburn have been bumped up to #1?
Orange: (5)Miami 31, (1)Nebraska 30.
Cotton: (7)Georgia 10, (2)Texas 9.
Sugar: (3)Auburn 9, (8)Michigan 7.
Rose: UCLA 45, (4)Illinois 9.
Oh, if we only had an 8-team playoff back then.
(1)Nebraska (12-0) vs (8)Michigan (9-2)
(4)Illinois (10-1) vs (5)Miami (10-1)
(2)Texas (11-0) vs (7)Georgia (9-1-1)
(3)Auburn (10-1) vs (6)SMU (10-1)