ericd7633
Well-Known Member
La. James, Thomas, and Jordan were all studs in college, and Blount and Alonso are both studs in the NFL. Blount led the NFL in rushing TDs and Alonso has had 115+ tackles in 2 of his 3 seasons and is coming off a great year in Miami. They were also an exceptionally accomplished college class.
Like I said, you can argue with that Stanford class, but I'd take Ertz and Murphy over any of those Clemson guys if you asked me today.
That Clemson class, let's examine:
Watkins: Elite in college, good but inconsistent/unhealthy in the NFL
Grady Jarrett: Good in college/good in the NFL
Kevin Dodd: 1 year of anything at all of note in college, though it was great/unproven in NFL
Anthony: Good in college/shitty in the NFL
Humphries/Bryant/Peake: Decent at best in college/not shit in the NFL
What's the big deal?? Could they be added over Stanford? Possibly. Is the list a "joke" because they're not in it? No, not even close.
It's not a big deal, It's just that not having Clemson in the top 10 is a joke. If one recruiting class ends with a dozen guys getting drafted or signing a contract with a team, I don't see how that doesn't make the list. Also, it should be noted that with this class it started the streak of winning 10 games a season.