- Thread starter
- #1
kbso83432
Well-Known Member
So Cooley has us taking him and in his film breakdown the other day he said he was a future Pro Bowler.
Everyone talks like he's not that good of an athlete, but he ran a 4.69 at the combine with a 37 inch vertical, did well in the other drills, 6'4/6'5 252 with the frame to look like Kerrigan's twin, 2nd team All-American, has the proverbial non-stop motor. I don't think he's much of a stretch at 17.
JJ says he's a better athlete than him. Think about that. These Watt's don't quit. Whoever gets him is getting a winner.
JJ Watt has 0 Super Bowls
What does that mean?
Cooley is full of BS and no way we trade anything with the Gnats!I listened to Cooley's mock this morning. He has the Skins trading the 17 to the Giants, getting a 3rd and drafting Watt at No. 23. I think there is a little man love going on there.
The intriguing thing to me about Watt is his bloodline. I like Bennett though.
Cooley is full of BS and no way we trade anything with the Gnats!
Just poking fun at the "JJ Watts a winner" crowd
I didn't mean it that way. I meant a good pick, that won't just be there to get a paycheck.
Oh, and last I checked JJ is on a team. Takes more than one guy. But yeah, a 3X DPOTY is a loser.
That first sentence sounds way too cynical. I mean, the guy is the best defensive player in football when healthy, and you're calling him "good". And it sounds like you're implying that when he does good things off the field - it's just to help his image.Just saying I think jj works as hard on his image as he does on being a good football player. There's hundreds of hard working football players.
If we could steal Conley in the third, I'd be a happy man. I really don't think he did that. She's already lied about where she first met him. Poor judgment to a rapist is a big leap.Get me some
1. Malik McDowell
2. Joe mixon
3. Caleb Brantley
4. Rueben foster
5. Christian mccafrey
6. Malik hooker (unlikely)
7. Garoon Conley
8. Dalvin cook
9. Kevin King
10. TJ Watt
That first sentence sounds way too cynical. I mean, the guy is the best defensive player in football when healthy, and you're calling him "good". And it sounds like you're implying that when he does good things off the field - it's just to help his image.