- Thread starter
- #21
AlaskaGuy
Throbbing Member
oopsMe neither, I can almost say with 100% certainty, they will not win the North... But dont quote me...
oopsMe neither, I can almost say with 100% certainty, they will not win the North... But dont quote me...
Usually 2-3 Weeks before the first game...So when exactly is it a good time to make predictions?
The only conference games that have me worried atm is @ Stanford and @ ASU.Usually 2-3 Weeks before the first game...
fifyi like that the huskies FANS are over confident
North:
1. Oregon
2. Washington
3. Stanford
4. Oregon State
5. Washington State
6. CAL
South:
1. USC
2. Arizona State
3. Utah
4. UCLA
5. Colorado
6. Arizona
PAC -12 title game. Oregon 42 USC 24
This guy says 'no'.North:
1. Oregon
2. Washington
3. Stanford
4. Oregon State
5. Washington State
6. CAL
South:
1. USC
2. Arizona State
3. Utah
4. UCLA
5. Colorado
6. Arizona
PAC -12 title game. Oregon 42 USC 24
After Washington/USC
everything else is chump change.
I'm leaning towards Washington
That ain't sayin' much. Like being the tallest midget.I've always said you are the smartest man on the Hoop!
Washington
Stanford
Washington St.
Oregon St.
Cal
Oregon
Utah
UCLA
USC
Colorado
Arizona St.
Arizona
Washington over Utah to clinch their playoff spot.
Hell, Whittingham and Kingsbury ought to get together and trade off. Coach GQ raids the defense for players.Utah has the best defensive coordinator in football, unfortunately he is the head coach. Every year he raids the offense to bolster the defense more. Any athlete that could go either way will be on defense every time. He builds teams that are destined for 2-3 in the south. Whittingham will keep scapegoating the offensive coordinator while leaving the cupboard bare. He has already moved the top two receiving options this year. Caleb Repp is now a DE instead of a TE, and Tyrone smith is now a 6'5" CB
Utah has the best defensive coordinator in football, unfortunately he is the head coach. Every year he raids the offense to bolster the defense more. Any athlete that could go either way will be on defense every time. He builds teams that are destined for 2-3 in the south. Whittingham will keep scapegoating the offensive coordinator while leaving the cupboard bare. He has already moved the top two receiving options this year. Caleb Repp is now a DE instead of a TE, and Tyrone smith is now a 6'5" CB
I'm not familiar with other teams rosters but at USC there's always a player or two that was recruited as one thing and turned out playing something else.
Some recent ones
Marquise Lee- was supposed to be a DB/CB but kept picking off and holding on to passes the coaches thought
he might make a good WR
Adoree- Some thought his primary spot should be on the offense
Darnold- was a QB and Linebacker in HS and was getting recruited mainly as a LB at USC till he told them he'd like to be a QB
Some make sense, Chase Hansen was a QB, but he is an amazing safety. Repp and Smith are not new recruits though. Both of them had success on offense last year(Repps was short because he got hurt). It also never goes the other way, he never moves defense to offense.
Whit has a horrible bias, and he hides it by firing the OC every year. That way people just think the offense never has time to gel, but really they are always talent deficient. One day Utah will move on though and every team out there should line up to hire him as the Defensive coordinator. He is great at that.
I'm no expert on the PAC.
But does Leach have it going on at WSU so good that he's displaced Stanford???
Leach did a great job at Texas Tech with leftover players.
Leach lucked into getting the one of the best quarterbacks in the country because he had his scholarship revoked at another school and was gifted a pretty solid core group of guys. After Falk leaves will be the real test if Leach can do his 9 win deal, we already know he doesn't know how to coach in bowl games or against FCS schools.