• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

This is why Oklahoma should have been in the playoffs

Wishbone

Robust Member
6,477
1,120
173
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Location
Oklahoma
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
The Sooners at least have the ability to score 3 touchdowns on anybody. At least make for an entertaining game.
 

jonvi

La Familia Ohana
28,901
6,616
533
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
Northern NY
Hoopla Cash
$ 29,463.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
The problem was and still remains the polls. Not seeing a way to improve writers and coaches opinions, I suggest an 8 team playoff system.
 

DT LUNA

Vietnam Veteran
36,847
5,186
533
Joined
Jul 2, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 950.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
The Sooners at least have the ability to score 3 touchdowns on anybody. At least make for an entertaining game.
OSU and Houston certainly don't agree and for sure the committee didn't. Not sure about UA yet but hope you can win that one.
 

DT LUNA

Vietnam Veteran
36,847
5,186
533
Joined
Jul 2, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 950.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
The problem was and still remains the polls. Not seeing a way to improve writers and coaches opinions, I suggest an 8 team playoff system.
No matter how many teams there are someone will be complaining. The committee got #1/2 right. #3/4 doesn't really matter. Could have been several good teams.
 

jonvi

La Familia Ohana
28,901
6,616
533
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
Northern NY
Hoopla Cash
$ 29,463.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
No matter how many teams there are someone will be complaining. The committee got #1/2 right. #3/4 doesn't really matter. Could have been several good teams.

Who is selected in the field or which team is complaining is not the point of allowing more teams into the playoffs. I didn't address the validity of the OP saying the sooners should have been there instead of tOSU. But with 8 teams we would most likely have found out. Get over the part of who is complaining.

The point of expanding the playoff format is taking the teams that performed very well over the season and letting them prove who is capable of the best performances in December after the wear and tear of the season. After the players are comfortable with each other. After everyone's systems are second nature.

4 teams is not enough of a representation of who's out there with the potential to be great.
 

romeo212000

Self-proclaimed Asshole
67,379
4,403
293
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,441.75
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Why? Because the team that bent us over to table earlier this year just got skunked by the team that beat us and knocked out 5 of our starters in last year's playoff? Let just hope for a sugar bowl win and cap off this awesome recruiting class strong.
 

TheReal_NU

This space intentionally left blank
6,432
1,071
173
Joined
Sep 11, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,119.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
The Sooners at least have the ability to score 3 touchdowns on anybody. At least make for an entertaining game.
72-21 is not entertaining.
 

Codaxx

Well-Known Member
13,355
1,562
173
Joined
Jun 27, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
No matter how many teams there are someone will be complaining. The committee got #1/2 right. #3/4 doesn't really matter. Could have been several good teams.

Perhaps you believe 1/2 were right, because 3/4 were wrong.
 

Wishbone

Robust Member
6,477
1,120
173
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Location
Oklahoma
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
All Im saying is that after starting 1-2 OU got better each and every week. That's what good teams do they improve as the season goes on. OU is not the same team now as when they started the year. Mayfield/Westbrook/Perine/Mixon can put us points.
 

DT LUNA

Vietnam Veteran
36,847
5,186
533
Joined
Jul 2, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 950.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Perhaps you believe 1/2 were right, because 3/4 were wrong.
Not what I believe. Facts are what they are. 3/4 could be a number of good teams. 1/2 won out fairly.
 

romeo212000

Self-proclaimed Asshole
67,379
4,403
293
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,441.75
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
All Im saying is that after starting 1-2 OU got better each and every week. That's what good teams do they improve as the season goes on. OU is not the same team now as when they started the year. Mayfield/Westbrook/Perine/Mixon can put us points.

We'll find out. I do feel there's a good chance the Houston game was an outlier, but we haven't faced a quality defense since Ohio state. Best one was probably either Kansas state or okie lite, and neither are anything close to what they'll face Monday. Let's just wait and see how they handle that team, before popping off. If they do what they should, they'll build momentum for a run next year.
 

Rolltide94

Well-Known Member
9,117
1,612
173
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 119.09
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
All Im saying is that after starting 1-2 OU got better each and every week. That's what good teams do they improve as the season goes on. OU is not the same team now as when they started the year. Mayfield/Westbrook/Perine/Mixon can put us points.

Maybe...or maybe you replaced Ohio St with Kansas as the season went on. Padding stats against shitty teams doesn't make your team better. Get back to us after Monday about how much your team has improved.
 

DT LUNA

Vietnam Veteran
36,847
5,186
533
Joined
Jul 2, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 950.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
All Im saying is that after starting 1-2 OU got better each and every week. That's what good teams do they improve as the season goes on. OU is not the same team now as when they started the year. Mayfield/Westbrook/Perine/Mixon can put us points.
POINTS? You have missed the point. Yes they can put up points but failing to do so early cost you to the point of no return.
 

romeo212000

Self-proclaimed Asshole
67,379
4,403
293
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,441.75
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Not what I believe. Facts are what they are. 3/4 could be a number of good teams. 1/2 won out fairly.

Some years 3,4 can make a title run, but not this year. It will go back and forth, but we don't need 8 teams.
 

jonvi

La Familia Ohana
28,901
6,616
533
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
Northern NY
Hoopla Cash
$ 29,463.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
?
Some years 3,4 can make a title run, but not this year. It will go back and forth, but we don't need 8 teams.

First I'll say....Bama is a cut above probably everyone and everyone else is competing for a chance at upsetting them.

But I'm not sure we had the four best teams in the hunt this year. For instance, LSU looked damn good over UoL. If LSU is in the hunt, Fournette plays.

This year the B10 was considered the best conference. Are we all that sure now? If we have conference strength wrong, then we don't have the four best teams competing for the National Championship. I'm saying we are more likely to see the 4 best teams in the playoffs with an 8 team format. I'm not getting why we wouldn't want that.?,
 

romeo212000

Self-proclaimed Asshole
67,379
4,403
293
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,441.75
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
?

First I'll say....Bama is a cut above probably everyone and everyone else is competing for a chance at upsetting them.

But I'm not sure we had the four best teams in the hunt this year. For instance, LSU looked damn good over UoL. If LSU is in the hunt, Fournette plays.

This year the B10 was considered the best conference. Are we all that sure now? If we have conference strength wrong, then we don't have the four best teams competing for the National Championship. I'm saying we are more likely to see the 4 best teams in the playoffs with an 8 team format. I'm not getting why we wouldn't want that.?,

I disagree with all of this.
 
Top