jerseyhawksfan79
Well-Known Member
Interesting. Who do you have them tieing?
I'm thinking Jets
Interesting. Who do you have them tieing?
I'm taking the Jets this weekend. Jets strong front 7, Seattle with a questionable O line and a hobbled QB. Plus the early east coast start.I'm thinking Jets
I'm taking the Jets this weekend. Jets strong front 7, Seattle with a questionable O line and a hobbled QB. Plus the early east coast start.
I'm taking the Jets this weekend. Jets strong front 7, Seattle with a questionable O line and a hobbled QB. Plus the early east coast start.
There is the Fitz factor. Can he really have back to back terrible games?It seems like a bad spot for Seattle and hopefully they remember to get off the bus before halftime but I think they can play well enough plus the D forces Fitz into a couple int's to be able to walk away with a win.
Without a doubt. It should be a close game barring another Fitz implosion. Sucks Hawks and Pats on the same time. I'll likely head down to the local watering hole so I can watch them both. Lucky for me they have a great breakfast.It's a similar situation that Arizona had last week against Buffalo. But unlike Arizona im confident that Seattle can at least be competitive.
There is the Fitz factor. Can he really have back to back terrible games?
There is the Fitz factor. Can he really have back to back terrible games?
Decker is out indefinitelyIt's got him cut a few times, I wouldn't be surprised.... And I think Marshall is out or playing injured.
Not sure I would consider KC that tough of a D? Statistically they're slightly above middle of the pack. Talent wise they should be better one would think? They'd be ranked a lot lower had they played anyone else beside the Fitz turnover machine. They lost to HoustonMaybe He's facing another tough defense so the possibility is there.
I am expecting it even though I want Baltimore to win.Anyone like Oakland over Baltimore?
Not sure I would consider KC that tough of a D? Statistically they're slightly above middle of the pack. Talent wise they should be better one would think? They'd be ranked a lot lower had they played anyone else beside the Fitz turnover machine. They lost to Houston
I took Baltimore in my pools. But not super confident so I put low points on them. Oak could definitely get a win. This should be a gauge to see if both these teams are real. Oak is performing to what I expected coming out of pre-season. Baltimore has been overachieving from what I expected. Niether team has had a tough schedule so hard to say. But hey you play your schedule.Anyone like Oakland over Baltimore?
We certainly agree on that. But KC to be considered a viable contender needs to win those games. I like KC had them making the playoffs. Maybe that was a down week for them?I though that was a tough spot for KC going to Houston after that big comeback against SD. One thing we can agree on is Fitz is really hurting by not being at camp.
Mmm, as bad as Fitz was, there weren't exactly a lot of open receivers and there was pressure in his face. If he just held onto the ball instead of playing heroball it would have probably been more like 5 sacks and 2 INT's instead. Osweiler threw 2 INT's as well against the Chiefs and his offense only scored 19 points. Chiefs turned it over 3 times as well and was never in blowout mode like the Jets game.Not sure I would consider KC that tough of a D? Statistically they're slightly above middle of the pack. Talent wise they should be better one would think? They'd be ranked a lot lower had they played anyone else beside the Fitz turnover machine. They lost to Houston