- Thread starter
- #1
He really seems to have zero regard for the farm system.AWFUL trade for boston.
Detroit, please take your dombrowski back...he's drunk.
They're only undervalued if you have 3-4 of them at once to chain with. But that's pretty unusual and rare for obvious reasons.Who here doesn't believe that closers are overvalued?
AWFUL trade for boston.
.
That is a trade package for Ty Ross....not a freaking closer.
Tyson Ross would get eaten alive in Fenway. He's pretty good as a #3, I guess. The Sox have enough guys like that.
Prospects are exactly that.... prospects. Sure they could become something, I think Margot would have done well in Boston but he was a trade chip. Now get some starters, remove Hanley and maybe even try to get Freeman because Hanley at first is going to be a disaster imo.
You're stuck with hanely for now.
Considering his throwing issues, playing panda at 1B and moving hanley to 3b (assuming he does drop the weight) wouldnt' be the worst idea.
Who here doesn't believe that closers are overvalued?
This is based on what?
The kid is a stud. he may not be harvey or a top tier #2 but most teams dont' have those guys.
He's fine starting #1 at the top of your rotation.
Yes, but he also has a K/9 over 9.5 and a HR/9 below 0.5. It tends to offset. He had a 2.98 FIP with 194 IP; good for a 4.4 fWAR season. I think you're selling him way short. Also, he's in his prime.Tyson Ross is an ace now? He's never thrown 200 innings before. He's never gotten a single Cy Young Vote. He led the NL in walks this season(and wild pitches). Your impression is masked by a guy in a pitcher's paradise and a pitcher-friendly division, in general. He's a nice #3. Nothing more. Where do you see "ace-worthy" here?