If they lose, this one's on Todd for being an idiot.
Woah I got it to work!
What a goal by Mitchell. How does the Canucks defense allow this to happen? I think Tanev and Hamhius were way too wide and Hamuis was over covering Wellwood who had no speed entering the zone. Hamhuis shouldn't have considered covering Wellwood.
Woah I got it to work!
What a goal by Mitchell. How does the Canucks defense allow this to happen? I think Tanev and Hamhius were way too wide and Hamuis was over covering Wellwood who had no speed entering the zone. Hamhuis shouldn't have considered covering Wellwood.
Tanev has 23 NHL games under his belt, and less than 40 AHL games even.
He still shows some growing pains every now and then, and that was one one them.
At that point in the game though, there should not have just been 2 guys back in any event.
Tanev has 23 NHL games under his belt, and less than 40 AHL games even.
He still shows some growing pains every now and then, and that was one one them.
At that point in the game though, there should not have just been 2 guys back in any event.
I think Tanev was not even the second guy at fault. Hamhuis should not have been that wide covering a Wellwood who had no speed entering the zone. Daniel makes a very weak poke attempt and Burrows, who was already behind the play, showed little hustle. Tanev slid over to cover Pavs who was straddling the blueline and may have slid over too far, but I just don't see it as Tanev being the main guy at fault.
I think Tanev was not even the second guy at fault. Hamhuis should not have been that wide covering a Wellwood who had no speed entering the zone. Daniel makes a very weak poke attempt and Burrows, who was already behind the play, showed little hustle. Tanev slid over to cover Pavs who was straddling the blueline and may have slid over too far, but I just don't see it as Tanev being the main guy at fault.