No backup TE? Risky businessyea, there really is 5 options... I think the most popular option will be 2WR, 2RB, 1 QB...
No backup TE? Risky business
Guess it depends if you think you have a top 5 option or not... Anything else you have to stream weeklyMany of us will do the backup TE... Again, it is very difficult with only 5 bench... if your starting TE gets hurt, what is the chances of the backup being fantasy relevant for you?? that is the question you have to ask...
Got a watch your byes. It's ideal to have only four WR, with different byes for each. The three wide roster can be a killer. Only three RB's is risky, but ideal as well. Usually though, the risk of being that short on the bench in that position is extreme.
I think two years ago, my third and only bench RB was Mikel Leshoure. Geesh, as I write that, man I hope I'm wrong.
There's really no correct answer unless you can guess which of your guys are going to get injured. Last year I carried 4 running backs, 4 wide receivers, 2 quarterbacks, 2 tight ends, 1 defense, and 1 kicker. I had a full lineup most weeks, but I think it depends on what running backs and receivers you have also. I like the idea of backing up your tight end only because that's a lot of zeroes if he gets hurt early.