WHERE ARE MY BOYs got a trade offer quick

[The Foot]

Montee Ball
Mike Wallace

or

Chris Johnson
Cord Patterson
Brian Hartline

 

[TREFF]

Ball and Wallace. Patterson makes the offer intriguing, But Hartline and CJblahK don't make up the difference.

 

[wilwhite]

Ditto.

 

[Beengay fudgepackers]

I ditto the ditto.

 

[ZepTepi]

You done been Ditto'd! err I agree!

 

[tlance]

I disagree.

Ball and Wallace by about 20 miles. If you are getting Ball, accept this before he can take it back. Wallace is just as good as Patterson in the short term.

 

[MilkSpiller22]

I think it is much closer than everyone gives credit. Chris Johnson was the 12 best rb in fantasy last season. He remains to be on a team that will love to run the ball. Ball has much more upside, and if you truly think he will be a top 5 rb then don't make the trade, but if you think that much of the ball hype is unwarranted(which I do), then the upgrade of Patterson is huge. But then again everything I said about ball is true too for Patterson. So it really comes down to whose upside do you more believe in Patterson or ball.

 

[Xponentialchaos]

Definitely Ball/Wallace.

 

[Sam Sportboy]

Montee Ball
Mike Wallace

or

Chris Johnson
Cord Patterson
Brian Hartline

Not as big a fan of Ball as most but that's the side I'd want to be on..................

 

[Bandit]

Ball and Wallace. I'm assuming this if for your dynasty league and if that's the case then it isn't even close for the Ball and Wallace side because of CJ1K's age.

 

[SteelersPride]

Ball Wallace click accept ASAP

 

[jarntt]

From someone who has argued against Ball being anywhere near a top 5 pick in a couple threads here and who thinks the "Ball love" (sorry couldn't resist) on here is a little crazy...of course the Ball side is better in this scenario. Yeah, CJ could be good, but he is expected to lose a bunch of carries and isn't on a team that is expected to have great fantasy numbers from its RBs. I don't like Wallace, but he has done it before, so he and Patterson could be close all year.

 

[TREFF]

From someone who has argued against Ball being anywhere near a top 5 pick in a couple threads here and who thinks the "Ball love" (sorry couldn't resist) on here is a little crazy...of course the Ball side is better in this scenario. Yeah, CJ could be good, but he is expected to lose a bunch of carries and isn't on a team that is expected to have great fantasy numbers from its RBs. I don't like Wallace, but he has done it before, so he and Patterson could be close all year.

Ball love? ? Well I am quite attached to mine, so guess I can't argue

 

[jarntt]

Touché...nice turn around...