- Thread starter
- #1
deanpet21
Well-Known Member
After listening to Grudens press conference he states that he liked Murphys pass rushing skills b/c of his sack total last year. Well if that was the case why wouldn't you just stay at 34 and take Van Noy? Van Noy could of played ILB and it a lot better player and pass rusher by far. Even after the trade down Attachou was avaible. How he is not a better pass rusher than Murphy? I just don't get it. I will say that Murphy does have the work ethic and high motor which must of beat overall talent when we made the selection. But as far as overall talent there is no way Murphy is better than Van Noy and Attachou.
As far as the trade down for the extra 3rd round pick. Yes this kid Long looks like a good player but he was taken way too high. There is no doubt that he could of been had in the 4th or 5th rounds b/c of his injury history. Plus with the trade you gave the Cowboys are division rival the pass rusher that they coveted in Lawerance. Who also is a better overall talent than Murphy.
All I can say about today is there are two outstanding CB's left in McGill from Utah and Watkins from Florida. Both had visits with the Redskins. If one of those guys is not taken with our 4th round pick . Something is definitely wrong.
I said my peace.
As far as the trade down for the extra 3rd round pick. Yes this kid Long looks like a good player but he was taken way too high. There is no doubt that he could of been had in the 4th or 5th rounds b/c of his injury history. Plus with the trade you gave the Cowboys are division rival the pass rusher that they coveted in Lawerance. Who also is a better overall talent than Murphy.
All I can say about today is there are two outstanding CB's left in McGill from Utah and Watkins from Florida. Both had visits with the Redskins. If one of those guys is not taken with our 4th round pick . Something is definitely wrong.
I said my peace.