Random FF Thoughts

[leftypower]

Quick pulse check to make sure I'm not the crazy one:
Guy puts 1.03 on the block (90% sure it's gonna be Hampton) so I asked what I would need to pair with 1.06 to move up 3 spots.
He asked for 1.16 and a future first
That's way too expensive, right?
I was thinking it would take a future 2nd since the move wasn't significant, but maybe I'm reading the value tiers wrong?

There will still be a nice RB (or two) at 1.6 with the Hunter aspect noted. So I'd agree, it's a bit too steep.

 

[TREFF]

Quick pulse check to make sure I'm not the crazy one:

Guy puts 1.03 on the block (90% sure it's gonna be Hampton) so I asked what I would need to pair with 1.06 to move up 3 spots.

He asked for 1.16 and a future first

That's way too expensive, right?
I was thinking it would take a future 2nd since the move wasn't significant, but maybe I'm reading the value tiers wrong?

That's the minimum of what I'd ask for. Seems fair to me.
There's the simple '3 spots', but then there's also bigger and bigger question marks after Jeanty/Hampton. Value drops FAST after #2-#3

 

[SmokingMonkey]

That's the minimum of what I'd ask for. Seems fair to me.
There's the simple '3 spots', but then there's also bigger and bigger question marks after Jeanty/Hampton. Value drops FAST after #2-#3

I have the value cliff closer to pick 7/8 than pick 3, the Ohio St RBs are the real deal imo.

Pretty much the exact price you paid for Jeanty in old school, but you got Jeanty with that package, not Hampton

 

[averagejoe]

I dont think anyone believes that the rookies will have the fantasy production in line with their ranking.

Just look at the 2024 class:

 

[TREFF]

I have the value cliff closer to pick 7/8 than pick 3, the Ohio St RBs are the real deal imo.

there's a second value cliff right there, for sure.

Judkins and Henderson might be the real deal, maybe, but they aren't in good situations, like at all. Sharing the ball in crappy offenses- in Judkins case, for the entirety of his rookie deal most likely- thus- why they're nowhere near the value of Hampton

Its Jeanty

Hampton (can put Hunter in here if applicable for your system)






Judkins/Henderson/Harvey/Hunter



and everyone else

 

[wilwhite]

there's a second value cliff right there, for sure.

Judkins and Henderson might be the real deal, maybe, but they aren't in good situations, like at all. Sharing the ball in crappy offenses- in Judkins case, for the entirety of his rookie deal most likely- thus- why they're nowhere near the value of Hampton

Its Jeanty

Hampton (can put Hunter in here if applicable for your system)






Judkins/Henderson/Harvey/Hunter



and everyone else

I have that gap wide enough that the WRs, TEs and Kaleb are in the mix with the third tier. Questions everywhere. Wouldn't shock me if Sampson and Judkins have an almost equal workload, for example.

 

[averagejoe]

Wouldn't shock me if Sampson and Judkins have an almost equal workload

Bingo

 

[TREFF]

I have that gap wide enough that the WRs, TEs and Kaleb are in the mix with the third tier. Questions everywhere. Wouldn't shock me if Sampson and Judkins have an almost equal workload, for example.

yeah depending on your needs, sure. Tet, Loveland, Warren, Egbuka, maybe Golden and Burden..all lumped into that tier. but if you don't need a TE or a WR and would only take one because the value at RB is gone, that puts them in a tier without the RB's..at least for me

Honestly I forgot about Kelab. I have him neck and neck with Harvey

 

[TREFF]

BTW..how did this end up here and not that sweet little rookie discussion thread?