Random FF Thoughts

[TREFF]

As long as he can throw it to ARSB and Gibbs, gonna have a hard time ranking him outside my top 12 QBs in redraft or dynasty. 30yrs old with 4-5 more prime seasons with little to no injury history.

Call me a cheap skate, but there's too good of value there when dynasty sites have him outside the top 20 QBs (21 on KTC, 17 on fantasy pros)

And Williams, and LaPorta..

Yes, exceptional value

 

[SmokingMonkey]

And Williams, and LaPorta..

Yes, exceptional value

Will be interesting to see if they reach a similar spot as McVay/Rams, where they feel he's a limiting factor to their SB chances now that they've tasted a little postseason action these last 2 seasons.

There were times last season where the Lions looked unbeatable.

 

[TREFF]

Will be interesting to see if they reach a similar spot as McVay/Rams, where they feel he's a limiting factor to their SB chances now that they've tasted a little postseason action these last 2 seasons.

There were times last season where the Lions looked unbeatable

It's funny I saw a meme..lions traded Stafford who could never get them over a hump and he wins a SB, and now they've built a contender and are one Matt Stafford away from winning a SB.

 

[SmokingMonkey]

It's funny I saw a meme..lions traded Stafford who could never get them over a hump and he wins a SB, and now they've built a contender and are one Matt Stafford away from winning a SB.

Would be hilarious if they traded back

 

[wilwhite]

Would be hilarious if they traded back

Worst thing is it would make a lot of sense.

Poor Goff.

 

[broncosmitty]

Worst thing is it would make a lot of sense.

Poor Goff.

Goff is better at this point.

Staff turns the ball over too much. Always has. Better arm, but worse decision maker.

 

[Bandit]

Goff is better at this point.

Staff turns the ball over too much. Always has. Better arm, but worse decision maker.

You say that, but not in the playoffs. I'm quite certain Stafford could have done better than Goff against a mediocre Commanders defense last year. With the Rams Stafford has 15 touchdowns and 3 interceptions in the playoffs. Both have started 10 playoff games so it makes it easy. Which guy would you rather have?

 

[broncosmitty]

You say that, but not in the playoffs. I'm quite certain Stafford could have done better than Goff against a mediocre Commanders defense last year. With the Rams Stafford has 15 touchdowns and 3 interceptions in the playoffs. Both have started 10 playoff games so it makes it easy. Which guy would you rather have?

View attachment 397371

View attachment 397372

The JV defense they ran out there gave up 45 points to Washington. You score 31 and lose by two touchdowns, it’s a little more than QB play that factored into the L.

I take Goff, Staff is about done.

 

[leftypower]

At least they seem to be spread out better than last yr.
BYE WEEKS
Week 5: Bears, Falcons, Packers, Steelers

Week 6: Texans, Vikings

Week 7: Bills, Ravens

Week 8:, Cardinals, Jaguars, Lions, Raiders, Seahawks

Week 9: Browns, Eagles, Jets, Rams, Bucs

Week 10: Bengals, Chiefs, Cowboys, Titans

Week 11: Colts, Saints

Week 12: Broncos, Chargers, Commanders, Dolphins

Week 13: Thanksgiving

Week 14: 49ers, Giants, Panthers, Patriots

 

[SmokingMonkey]

Zero bye week issues with my QBs, been a few seasons

 

[obxyankeefan]

Week 8 and 9 have to be wrong. They can't have an odd number of teams playing.

 

[SmokingMonkey]

Week 8 and 9 have to be wrong. They can't have an odd number of teams playing.

Rams are supposed to be week 8

 

[leftypower]

Rams are supposed to be week 8

Copied from CBS so it's not surprising they got something wrong. ....

 

[SmokingMonkey]

Copied from CBS so it's not surprising they got something wrong. ....

I'm part robot, so I like things in spreadsheets, found this on thehuddle.com

 

[SmokingMonkey]

Quick pulse check to make sure I'm not the crazy one:

Guy puts 1.03 on the block (90% sure it's gonna be Hampton) so I asked what I would need to pair with 1.06 to move up 3 spots.

He asked for 1.16 and a future first

That's way too expensive, right?
I was thinking it would take a future 2nd since the move wasn't significant, but maybe I'm reading the value tiers wrong?

 

[averagejoe]

Sounds like he's one of those "values be damned" guys and he wants what he wants.

 

[wilwhite]

Quick pulse check to make sure I'm not the crazy one:

Guy puts 1.03 on the block (90% sure it's gonna be Hampton) so I asked what I would need to pair with 1.06 to move up 3 spots.

He asked for 1.16 and a future first

That's way too expensive, right?
I was thinking it would take a future 2nd since the move wasn't significant, but maybe I'm reading the value tiers wrong?

I think it’s too expensive but that’s because I think Hampton will be 1.02 and then it drops a lot and the 1.06 isn’t noticeably worse than the 1.03 (or better than the 1.10).

 

[averagejoe]

That's way too expensive, right?

I think it’s too expensive

You guys know rookies better than I do, but many have touted the depth of this RB class which leads me to believe that when we look back on this season in January, there will be some valued players that didn't have the luxury of a favorable scouting report.

 

[SmokingMonkey]

I think it’s too expensive but that’s because I think Hampton will be 1.02 and then it drops a lot and the 1.06 isn’t noticeably worse than the 1.03 (or better than the 1.10).

Really confident hunter goes 1.02, idp league so he's a cheat code

 

[wilwhite]

Really confident hunter goes 1.02, idp league so he's a cheat code

Yeah, that bumps up the value of the 1.03.

Still too expensive, but closer.