- Thread starter
- #3,041
Pastafazul
Well-Known Member
Hows the Load Mgmt y’all said was good for the league workin out for , the cavs half team on IL, Curry out a week , and all other Injuries to players that are hamperin teams chances?
That is hilarious. You are wrong more often than a broken clock.
And you should really wait until they get 2 more wins before you start talking crap. Last I checked Boston is still pretty heavy favorites to win the series.
And this is the 2nd round. So….
Still say Brunson ain’t a superstar in this league?
Not as athletic, savy as one should be
But the man gets it done!
DUDE
@tlance…
My initial post in this thread about the Knicks in this PS was that they would go deep into PS, you said they had no chance getting passed 2nd round.
so what I posted diffidently , that’s the shit we do on here for entertainment
Bottom line here is you have not been right in any of the discussions we have had about the game
Here’s another about Thibs giving too many minutes to his star players reg season and that they would be too tired for the PS… lol, Knicks are the healthiest team up till now in this PS
You were wrong about load mgmt, rest is good to avoid serious injuries down the line, how’s that turned out for the Cavs , GS. And now Tatum?
There are too many too list
Ya never responded to another one of your great calls that Brunson wasn’t a superstar in this league
And another, take a look at all teams in this PS, full of former Knicks players that weren’t good enough to win a ring , you said hartenstein, Donte, Randle To name a few all doin their best to give their team a shot.
As far as thibs goes, he got nuttin to do with the fact that DOLAN, another one of your great calls, sayin no superstars will play at MSG, are here! That stars players have been here , and that the current GM he hired brought these guys in to win, not Thibs!
Thibs is just goin along for the ride.
I am likely wrong about the Knicks losing round 2.
But you cannot claim to be right when you straddle both sides.
At least I have a consistent take.
And Brunson might be a superstar now.
He sure as hell wasn’t 2 years ago.
You wrong about most of the stuff you claim to be right about.
I am likely wrong about the Knicks losing round 2.
But you cannot claim to be right when you straddle both sides.
At least I have a consistent take.
And Brunson might be a superstar now.
He sure as hell wasn’t 2 years ago.
You wrong about most of the stuff you claim to be right about.
Knicks need to close it out tomorrow nite, celts are 8-2 this year without Tatum, giving them any momentum could be catastrophic
And yes you do have a consistent take, you’re consistently wrong!
Brunson might be a superstar now ? lol. Ok
I may not be the most eloquent poster , but my calls for most part come too fruition , while your postings are just eloquently wrong
You said Brunson was a superstar a long time ago.
Not that he was going to be a superstar
And like @trojanfan12 said, that is certainly up for debate.
How about what they say TO him?I’ll go with what his peers say about him…
How about what they say TO him?
"Hey Brunson, stop flopping like a bitch!"
I still don't consider him a superstar.
He is absolutely a great player. But not a superstar.
He's a lot like Jayson Tatum who is also a great player, but not a superstar.
If I'm going to a game where the Celtics or Knicks are playing...I'm going to see the Celtics or Knicks...not Jayson Tatum or Brunson.
On the other hand, if I'm going to a Warriors game...I'm going to see Steph, not the Warriors. If I'm not going to a Nuggets game...I'm going to see Joker...not the Nuggets.
Imo, if you're going to a game to see a specific great player...that's a superstar.
Sure he can.....that's what irrationals do. whatever suits the agenda du jour.Just stop already.
YOU were one of the people talking loudest about how the Knicks have no chance against the Celtics and that the Celtics are easily going to win the title.
You can’t claim that the Knicks are contenders in some posts, then claim that they have no chance in others.
And then come back and act like you have been right all along.
Oh, and fire Thibs right?
if you play both sides of the fence of course you will be right......and wrong.Knicks need to close it out tomorrow nite, celts are 8-2 this year without Tatum, giving them any momentum could be catastrophic
And yes you do have a consistent take, you’re consistently wrong!
Brunson might be a superstar now ? lol. Ok
I may not be the most eloquent poster , but my calls for most part come too fruition , while your postings are just eloquently wrong
Couple of few months back posted Knicks were the 3rd best team in the NBA
Posted a few injuries to key players of at the time, elite teams, Knicks could slip in
Posted Knicks will be a better team in PS, that they still were gettin to know each others game
Posted Thibs should be canned, still feel he’s not the coach for an offensively skilled team…
3 outta 4 ain’t bad for a clueless moron , ain’t that right, “original artists” better known as “tlance and his nuthuggers”
They aren’t the 3rd best team in the NBA.
I am hoping that is the one you were counting wrong.
But they are still playing, so that is something.
And you been posting Thibs should be fired for years now. Eventually it will happen and you will claim to have “nailed it”.
But you continue to give him zero crest for what the Knicks have accomplished. And that is a huge mistake.
He is a good coach.
You never disappoint!
Find me one post where I posted thibs was a bad coach..
I have posted 100 times , thibs is a good coach, but has no offensive creativity that could steal a game or 2, that’s what you need to get to the next level when you don’t have that special squad. Imo, they are still 1 player away, but I could be wrong.
I’m good with that.
lol, so if they win it all they still won’t be the best in the world according to you!
That’s awesome