- Thread starter
- #1
skinz2winz
Well-Known Member
Looks like someone is trying to keep up with the Jones'.
It's pretty obvious to most what Dallas gains from this trade, but what do you see as a gain from the Steelers' side of it?
They do not have to pay Pickens (gain) and do not have to deal with a head case (another gain). Metcalf becomes the go to in Pittsburgh.It's pretty obvious to most what Dallas gains from this trade, but what do you see as a gain from the Steelers' side of it?
I kind of see your point, but they didn't have to redo his contract this year. He will earn 3.7 million in the 2025 season before becoming an unrestricted free agent in 2026, barring an extension with Dallas. Pittsburgh could have kept him this year, gotten the production that you've mentioned, then moved on. It's obvious that they had no intention of doing that, so the trade was logical.not having to give a massive contract to a man-baby?
i mean, it's still gonna suck for us as far as on-field production is concerned, but um, yeah. at least there's that?
not having to give a massive contract to a man-baby?
i mean, it's still gonna suck for us as far as on-field production is concerned, but um, yeah. at least there's that?
Are these reasonable explanations? I think not, so here are better reasons for this trade.They do not have to pay Pickens (gain) and do not have to deal with a head case (another gain). Metcalf becomes the go to in Pittsburgh.
I kind of see your point, but they didn't have to redo his contract this year. He will earn 3.7 million in the 2025 season before becoming an unrestricted free agent in 2026, barring an extension with Dallas. Pittsburgh could have kept him this year, gotten the production that you've mentioned, then moved on. It's obvious that they had no intention of doing that, so the trade was logical.
I believe it's going to work well for the offense. Lamb may go crazy, and i may even draft Dak as a 3rd stringer on my fantasy squad