MBBRL dynasty main page

[Chef99]

Damn, @broncosmitty - you caught me in a weak moment for that Olson/ Dollander trade.

Good for you.

 

[broncosmitty]

Damn, @broncosmitty - you caught me in a weak moment for that Olson/ Dollander trade.

Good for you.

He hasn’t even been a pro for two years yet. Dont go giving up on the kid just yet.

Here, have some cake…

 

[TKOSpikes]

yahoo is famous for using terrible defaults... not just stats, but in position eligibility...

with that said, i like that they use OUTS and not INNINGS.... i may take that...

For comparison...
My home league is a 15 team points league. 300+ is a great week. Low 200's or less is a bad week. We start 13 hitters, 5 starters, 2 relievers (but we do team bullpen rights during the draft).

Hitters
Strike out: -0.5
Walk/HBP: 0.5
Single: 1
Double: 2
Triple: 3
HR: 4
RBI: 1
Run Scored: 1 (solo HR+RBI+R=6 points)
SB: 1.5
CS: -0.5
GDP: -1.5

Pitchers
IP: 0.5 (1st out .17 -->2nd out .33 -->3rd out 0.5)
W: 9
L: -3
QS: 4
Strikeout: 1
ER: -1
CG: 2
SO: 2
S: 6
H: 3
BS: -4
BS/BSW: you don't get the points for the Bull Shit Win, but your blown save is erased

2024 results, top 3
Ohtani: 713.5
Judge: 625
Witt: 622

Skubal: 511
Wheeler: 494
Sale: 492

2023
Acuna 720.5
Freeman 590.5
Olson: 585.5

Strider: 531
Cole: 504.5
Gallen: 460


It might look skewed to bats (let's not forget the ridiculousness of Ohtani, Judges, and Acuna seasons...Freeman to Strider isn't as gaping), but in a weekly game a pitcher can have two starts. A good start with a win is mid-to-high 20's (pending the K's)... which is also a good week for hitters. Great weeks by hitters (30+) are more than great weeks by pitchers, but 2-starters that pay off are usually 40+... so it balances on a weekly basis

 

[TKOSpikes]

The W vs QS debate is tough for me.

6 innings, 8 hits, 3 er, 8 walks, 0 k = QS

5 innings, 10 hits, 10 er, 10 walks, 0 k = W if your team scored 11 before the 6th and stayed ahead

I just find it important to not punish pitchers too often for too little.

 

[MilkSpiller22]

The W vs QS debate is tough for me.

6 innings, 8 hits, 3 er, 8 walks, 0 k = QS

5 innings, 10 hits, 10 er, 10 walks, 0 k = W if your team scored 11 before the 6th and stayed ahead

I just find it important to not punish pitchers too often for too little.

I may be leaning towards the win especially after increasing points on either outs or innings.

 

[broncosmitty]

Really need something out of my relievers this afternoon.

League Average can’t go beating me twice this week.

 

[Robotech]

I may be leaning towards the win especially after increasing points on either outs or innings.

I think we should keep both wins and quality starts, but it sounds like extra points for outs or innings will make up for it if we remove QS. I also think that we should keep the +2 for homeruns. Homeruns are special. Too bad my team can barely hit any. LOL.

And I think holds should be 5 points and saves should be 6 points. I don't think we need to lower hold and save points by 2. Lowering it by 1 point should be enough. If we add more points for outs/innings, we'd already be making an adjustment to increase SP points.

 

[Yellow Fuzzies]

I think we should keep both wins and quality starts, but it sounds like extra points for outs or innings will make up for it if we remove QS. I also think that we should keep the +2 for homeruns. Homeruns are special. Too bad my team can barely hit any. LOL.

And I think holds should be 5 points and saves should be 6 points. I don't think we need to lower hold and save points by 2. Lowering it by 1 point should be enough. If we add more points for outs/innings, we'd already be making an adjustment to increase SP points.

My vote-4 pts for holds, 6 pts for saves.