- Thread starter
- #5,501
calsnowskier
Sarcastic F-wad
Well…Well, I haven't changed my avatar
You avatar wasn’t a complete fucking fat ass dimwit.
Well…Well, I haven't changed my avatar
Just guessing here: they think he'll go unclaimed and they can bring him back.Giants non-tendered Cruz, Szapucki and Waites.
Cruz and Szapucki, while a bit surprising, are not overly shocking. Waites is a shock, imho.
I was wondering why they didn’t just DFA them. By non-tendering, they made them all FAs immediately.Just guessing here: they think he'll go unclaimed and they can bring him back.
Well, I haven't changed my avatar
Weird moves. Not sure why the Giants need to make room on the 40 man roster. I thought FZ loves to pay pitchers to rehab and then let them go afterward (oh wait, he already did that with Szapucki).Giants non-tendered Cruz, Szapucki and Waites.
Cruz and Szapucki, while a bit surprising, are not overly shocking. Waites is a shock, imho.
Just guessing here: they think he'll go unclaimed and they can bring him back.
That is not how non-tenders work. Players not tended a contract immediately become free agents and can sign with anyone, just like any other major league free agent. The only way the Giants get them back is if they re-sign them to new deals.I was wondering why they didn’t just DFA them. By non-tendering, they made them all FAs immediately.
@MarcoPolo ?
Um…That is not how non-tenders work. Players not tended a contract immediately become free agents and can sign with anyone, just like any other major league free agent. The only way the Giants get them back is if they re-sign them to new deals.
You asked Marco (unless you were tagging him for something else). I answered for him.Um…
I think that is what I said, isn’t it?
My question was about why the Giants would not have DFAd them instead of non-tendering them. A DFA would have required the new team to put them onto their 40. Non tendering just cuts them loose. I don’t understand the non-tender decision.You asked Marco (unless you were tagging him for something else). I answered for him.
Got it.My question was about why the Giants would not have DFAd them instead of non-tendering them. A DFA would have required the new team to put them onto their 40. Non tendering just cuts them loose. I don’t understand the non-tender decision.
Thats a smart move.Szapucki back in the fold on a minor league pact.
| 11/30/23 | RHP José Cruz assigned to Sacramento River Cats. |
Looks like he re-upped on the 20thI saw this on the milb.com transactions page. Apparently, Cruz re-signed to a minor league deal:
![]()
11/30/23 RHP José Cruz assigned to Sacramento River Cats.
My question was about why the Giants would not have DFAd them instead of non-tendering them. A DFA would have required the new team to put them onto their 40. Non tendering just cuts them loose. I don’t understand the non-tender decision.
This better not be instead of Yamamoto.Lee added to 40
I see the Giants, at best, finishing 4th…This better not be instead of Yamamoto.
Of course, I have to confess that the most money may still not land Yamamoto but if he doesn't sign with SF it better be because he got a better offer with SF but wanted to play alongside another Japanese player.